Robinhood Chain Hot Tokens Sep 18: $AD +20,457%
- $AD (Artificial Doge) is up 20,456.84% in 24h at seven hours old, with a website that verifies against the chain — and a same-name copycat contract
- $MUSEBOOK day three: token-wide liquidity nearly tripled to $2,549,829, but 26,320 sells against 17,053 buys
- Ex-stablecoin volume is $70,935,817 (+58.7%), yet 9 of 12 tokens had more distinct sellers than buyers
Robinhood Chain hot tokens today, September 18: two golden dogs on the board. $AD (Artificial Doge) is up 20,456.84% in 24h at seven hours old, and $MUSEBOOK is still here on day three at +186.24%. Before you get excited, the sobering number: 9 of the 12 tokens on this list had more distinct sellers than buyers.
Data timestamp: 2026-09-18 00:08:32 UTC, from the BigPump hot-token research pack (GeckoTerminal main-pool basis), with token-wide figures from DexScreener pulled 00:20–00:50 UTC.
Today's tape: volume came back, people did not
The 12 tokens did $488,699,418 in 24h volume. That headline is fake: USDG alone is $417,763,601 of it, or 85.5%. Strip the stablecoin and you get $70,935,817 — up 58.7% from yesterday's $44,705,915. Liquidity ex-USDG is $49,756,832, down 4.4% from $52.06M.
So: more trading, not more money. Turnover ex-USDG is 1.43x, which is a real market rather than the dead water we had yesterday, but the pools did not get deeper.
The participant count is blunter. Across the board there were 56,462 distinct buyers and 58,032 distinct sellers, and 9 of 12 tokens had sellers outnumbering buyers. Only three ran the other way: PONS (883/679), AD (1,066/1,035), WALLET (3,939/3,818). The one bright spot is the 1h window — 11,699 buys against 10,893 sells.
Today's board
| # | Token | Price | 1h | 6h | 24h | 24h vol | Liquidity | Mkt cap | Buys/Sells | Buyers/Sellers | Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PONS | $0.691418 | +1.14% | +6.26% | +20.62% | $11,021,167 | $9,066,032 | $474,343,697 | 9,171/5,583 | 883/679 | 1,486h |
| 2 | DPONS | $0.00028134 | -12.62% | -14.98% | -13.35% | $687,865 | $38,607 | $286,582 | 6,052/5,597 | 3,123/3,171 | 143h |
| 3 | AD | $0.00030506 | -8.88% | +242.04% | +20,456.84% | $372,088 | $43,999 | $307,155 | 2,117/2,040 | 1,066/1,035 | 7h |
| 4 | ROBIN | $0.00389026 | -4.19% | +3.51% | +21.70% | $1,425,944 | $161,012 | $3,936,135 | 9,408/7,940 | 3,976/4,031 | 295h |
| 5 | MUSEBOOK | $0.00012000 | +10.92% | -15.65% | +186.24% | $14,396,193 | $2,788,482 | $11,999,947 | 17,053/26,320 | 3,294/3,429 | 42h |
| 6 | WALLET | $0.01598177 | -13.29% | +77.76% | -72.97% | $20,365,014 | $1,639,347 | $15,981,771 | 20,941/14,072 | 3,939/3,818 | 1,679h |
| 7 | HBET | $0.00000836 | 0.00% | -4.40% | -32.26% | $1,417 | $7,432 | $8,364 | 13/31 | 10/20 | 72h |
| 8 | AI | $0.32327333 | -0.17% | -11.78% | +25.44% | $2,135,522 | $31,032,690 | $324,966,372 | 1,028/1,780 | 590/781 | 1,566h |
| 9 | CASHCAT | $0.20386348 | +0.26% | -1.95% | +10.40% | $6,935,560 | $2,431,783 | $200,204,233 | 5,772/6,530 | 839/1,277 | 1,876h |
| 10 | DELTA | $0.01324620 | -1.97% | +0.13% | -10.83% | $1,835,636 | $974,492 | $11,920,543 | 1,908/1,742 | 560/611 | 1,153h |
| 11 | USDG | $1.00069098 | -0.05% | +0.03% | +0.08% | $417,763,601 | $25,359,035 | $3,286,355,705 | 269,019/277,608 | 36,416/37,374 | 1,851h |
| 12 | MEME | $0.03664433 | +2.85% | -14.02% | +23.74% | $11,759,411 | $1,572,957 | $36,644,333 | 6,540/5,858 | 1,766/1,806 | 169h |
Golden dog one: $AD, +20,457% in seven hours, and the site actually matches
Why it pumped. AD is Artificial Doge. The main pool is a Uniswap v4 AD/WETH 0.25% pool created 2026-09-17 17:07:49 UTC, which puts it at exactly seven hours when the snapshot was taken. In 24h it did 2,117 buys against 2,040 sells, with 1,066 distinct buyers against 1,035 sellers — one of only three buy-side tokens on the board. Turnover is 8.46x and the average ticket is $89.51: a thin, early, retail pool.
What made me look twice is rarer than the number. Its website verifies against the chain. artificial-doge.com prints the contract 0x63ffd4aa844f4befcee1b4606e467d1d209a926b, character-for-character identical to the address in the data pack, and the GeckoTerminal chart it links to is the same main pool the data pack picked. The site claims a 1,000,000,000 supply, zero tax in and out, "made for entertainment," and carries its own disclaimer. On this chain most hot tokens have no website at all, so this counts for something.
The case for more upside: buy-side order flow, 1,066 distinct buyers (not one whale round-tripping), 6h still +242.04%, and a contract you can verify yourself.
The case against: 1h is already -8.88%, so momentum is rolling over. Liquidity is $43,999, which means a mid-size entry eats slippage going in and again coming out. And a copycat contract already exists — DexScreener lists a second "Artificial Doge" at 0x1898e995A4423b7c8729CD3F8D5c8Fbe32aCDE8F with $5,419 liquidity, $2 of 24h volume and a price roughly 86x cheaper. If you buy by searching the ticker, you can absolutely land on the wrong one.
My call: small size, verify the address first. Entering after +20,457% means buying the move somebody else already made in seven hours. I would not size up here. Full breakdown in What Is $AD? +20,457% in Seven Hours, and the Site Checks Out.
Golden dog two: $MUSEBOOK day three, deeper pools, more sellers
MUSEBOOK was yesterday's golden dog at +1,203.73%. It is still on the board at +186.24%. The interesting line is liquidity: DexScreener token-wide was $864,826 yesterday and is $2,549,829 today — close to triple. The main pool is musebook/META at $1,261,051 (paired against the tokenized Meta stock, tagged bankr-robinhood on GeckoTerminal), with musebook/WETH second at $673,678. Pools getting deeper is not what a rug looks like.
The flow is ugly though: 17,053 buys against 26,320 sells, a ratio of 0.65, with 3,429 distinct sellers against 3,294 buyers. Price up on sell-side flow is distribution. And for the third day running, musebook.lol still does not publish a contract address anywhere — the only mention is one line imagining auction slots priced in "$musebook".
Full breakdown in $MUSEBOOK Day Three: Liquidity Triples, Sells Still Lead by 54%.
The line worth staring at: $WALLET goes from dead money to second-biggest tape
WALLET is a 1,679-hour pool — about 70 days old. On September 11 I wrote it up as the lowest turnover on the board at 0.81x, with several hundred thousand dollars of money nobody was touching.
Today it did $20,365,014 in 24h volume at 12.42x turnover, second only to the stablecoin. The price paid for that is -72.97%. The +77.76% in the 6h window is not a repair, it is a bounce off a crash — the main pool (Uniswap v3 WALLET/WETH 1%, created 2026-07-10) is -73.34% on the day and every satellite pool sits between -72% and -74%. Nothing escaped.
More in $WALLET: 70 Days of Dead Money, Spent in One Day.
The rest of the board
- PONS +20.62%, green across 1h/6h/24h, 883 distinct buyers against 679 sellers, turnover only 1.22x — the cleanest combination on the board today. Watch the basis though: the data pack's main pool reads $9,066,032 while DexScreener's 30 pools total $28,110,050, a 3.1x gap.
- AI (Artificial Inu) +25.44%, but 781 distinct sellers against 590 buyers — price up, distribution underneath. Its site artificialinu.com prints 0x2E8c31162b855A2ffa90F6F8634643Ad6F111e18, which matches the data pack. Verified.
- DPONS -13.35% on 17.82x turnover with a $59.05 average ticket and 3,171 distinct sellers against 3,123 buyers — third straight day of sell-side dominance in a thin, high-churn pool.
- HBET has effectively stopped: $1,417 of 24h volume, $7,432 liquidity, and four of its five pools hold $1–$2 of dust.
- ROBIN +21.70%, with a familiar problem: its largest DexScreener pool holds $1,470,269 and did $27,226 of volume, while a $161,086 pool next to it did $1,436,050. Liquidity printed on a screen is not liquidity you can route into.
Wealth effect: $100 median $115.51
Put $100 into each of these 12 tokens 24 hours ago (back-calculated from the 24h change, ignoring slippage and tax) and the median outcome is $115.51; ex-stablecoin the median is $120.62. That is the best day since September 14 ($118.91) and a lot better than yesterday's $94.22.
The median is carried by a couple of names: the $100 in AD becomes $20,556.84, the $100 in WALLET is worth $27.03. Full back-test and the four filters in $100 for a Day: $115.51 Median, Four Filters Leave One Token.
Today's tactic: use distinct participants, not transaction counts
Today's board has a clean example. MEME's transaction counts are 6,540 buys against 5,858 sells, which looks buy-side. Its distinct participant counts are 1,766 buyers against 1,806 sellers, which is the opposite. Transaction counts get inflated by high-frequency wash flow; participant counts do not.
How I use it: transaction ratio is for short-term mood only, and a participant ratio below 1 is a distribution flag, read alongside the 1h change. Nine tokens are below 1 today, and three of them — AI, CASHCAT, MEME — are also up on the day. Those three are the textbook "rising into distribution" setup.
On the MEME trading page the chart, the trade feed and the holder breakdown sit on one screen, so you are not switching between three sites to check this.
New launches watchlist (10, at 00:08 UTC)
Eight of today's ten new launches are Pons V2 bonding-curve pools (TEST, VRDCT, THECURB, $CAL, SPIRAL, GP, ANYPAD, plus SHINY's curve pool), all reading between $3,283 and $5,531. Saying it again: that number is the curve's starting reading, not four thousand dollars somebody deposited.
Two exceptions are worth your time:
- SHINY (Shiny Pack NFT: By Logan Paul): curve pool created 00:04:43, graduated pool on pons-v2-dex at 00:05:07 — twenty-four seconds. An 81% fee pool showed up at 00:06:44. And there are two identically named contracts, created 27 seconds apart. Breakdown in $SHINY Graduated in 24 Seconds.
- ZEC (Zcash): the data pack reads liquidity of -$7,337.52 — negative, and GeckoTerminal returns the same negative number. I counted seven contracts called "Zcash" on this chain today. See Seven Zcash Contracts and One Negative Number.
- INUININU: opened directly on Uniswap v4, $23,579 liquidity in the pack (GeckoTerminal read $32,503 about ten minutes later), +198.4% in 24h.
And yesterday's ten? Nine have no pools at all on DexScreener today. The one survivor is DEPTH — the token whose data-pack reading yesterday was $1 of liquidity. The full trace is here.
FAQ
Can I still buy $AD?
For: buy-side flow, 1,066 distinct buyers, a contract you can verify on the project site. Against: 1h already negative, $43,999 of liquidity, and a copycat contract with the same name. Not investment advice — memecoins can go to zero.
Why is a stablecoin on the hot list?
The list ranks by volume, and USDG is this chain's native stablecoin, so its volume ($417,763,601) is structurally huge. Strip it out before reading any board-wide trend, or "volume up X%" will mislead you completely.
How do I tell if a token is being distributed?
Use the distinct buyer/seller ratio rather than raw transaction counts. A ratio under 1 while the price is rising usually means somebody is selling into the strength.
What does "$4,000 liquidity" on a new launch mean?
It is the Pons V2 bonding curve's starting reading, virtual reserve included. It does not mean four thousand real dollars are in the pool. Eight of today's ten launches read that way.
Where do I watch this live?
The BigPump hot-token page puts the chart, trade feed, holder distribution and an in-page swap together — for example the $AD trading page. If you want to launch your own token, that is the one-click launch page, and the mechanics are documented at book.bigpump.ai.
BigPump is an independent project. It is not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Robinhood Markets, Inc. All on-chain figures come from the 2026-09-18 00:08:32 UTC snapshot. Not investment advice — memecoins can go to zero.
Disclaimer: memecoins are extremely volatile and most go to zero. This article is not financial advice. Do your own research and only spend what you can afford to lose.