Robinhood Chain Hot Tokens Sep 11: JUGGERNAUT +379%Guide
- Robinhood added searchable asset pages for JUGGERNAUT and FRONG on 9/10 — not spot listings; the two are +379.29% and +165.79%
- Board volume is +35.8% entirely because of those two: the 6 tokens on both days are -2.4% liquidity and +0.7% volume
- SIH -96.61% with 3,416 buyers and 170 holders left; the $100 basket median is $94.68
Robinhood Chain had exactly one story on Sep 11: Robinhood added searchable asset pages for two memecoins, and JUGGERNAUT went +379.29% while FRONG went +165.79%. The same dataset says something less fun — JUGGERNAUT is already 42.4% below its 24h high, and yesterday's two golden dogs, PONIE and ROBIN, are down 38.39% and 24.91%. Snapshot time: 2026-09-11 00:09 UTC, ETH $2,442.76.
Today's tone: volume up 35.8%, but only two tokens moved
Board-wide 24h volume went from $71,683,607 to $97,361,963 (+35.8%). Total liquidity fell from $34,675,715 to $18,016,208 — which looks like -48.0%, and that number is misleading. AI (Artificial Inu) dropped off the board taking $20,815,557 of liquidity with it. The constituents changed, not the money.
Look only at the 6 tokens on both boards (ASHIBA, CASHCAT, CHUMP, PONIE, PONS, ROBIN): liquidity $13,088,503 → $12,768,091 (-2.4%), volume $46,985,996 → $47,310,354 (+0.7%). Basically flat.
So the extra $25.7M of volume is almost entirely JUGGERNAUT ($26.5M) plus FRONG ($18.6M). No new money showed up anywhere else.
Transaction buy/sell ratio: 96,802 / 97,248 = 1.00 (1.10 yesterday). Unique buyers 21,011 / unique sellers 22,691 = 0.93. More addresses selling; the buy count is stacked up by fewer wallets.
The board (2026-09-11 00:09 UTC)
| # | Token | Price | 1h | 24h | 24h vol | Liquidity | Mkt cap | Holders | Age | Turnover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PONIE | $0.00013770 | +3.79% | -38.39% | $1,652,443 | $37,908 | $138,584 | 9,654 | 92h | 43.6x |
| 2 | ROBIN | $0.0089462 | -14.82% | -24.91% | $1,383,197 | $245,806 | $8,946,164 | no public data | 127h | 5.6x |
| 3 | SIH | $0.0000036265 | 0.00% | -96.61% | $858,970 | $5,091 | $3,627 | 170 | 25h | 168.7x |
| 4 | JUGGERNAUT | $0.0119814 | +18.36% | +379.29% | $26,486,320 | $743,860 | $12,214,990 | 22,398 | 1,767h | 35.6x |
| 5 | CHUMP | $0.0475104 | +3.40% | +20.65% | $5,489,821 | $1,386,335 | $47,510,409 | 11,188 | 1,006h | 4.0x |
| 6 | KERMIT | $0.00048116 | -30.01% | +49.62% | $840,856 | $55,691 | $434,629 | 1,400 | 28h | 15.1x |
| 7 | ASHIBA | $0.000079674 | +5.39% | -63.26% | $190,501 | $34,416 | $79,674 | no public data | 58h | 5.5x |
| 8 | PONS | $0.5766958 | -1.35% | -14.21% | $28,396,712 | $8,707,363 | $410,667,829 | no public data | 1,318h | 3.3x |
| 9 | FRONG | $0.0089071 | +17.14% | +165.79% | $18,585,010 | $1,118,624 | $8,912,830 | 15,983 | 1,012h | 16.6x |
| 10 | PYRE | $0.000097218 | -6.12% | -45.02% | $79,346 | $35,017 | $93,973 | no public data | 53h | 2.3x |
| 11 | WALLET | $0.0576227 | +11.01% | +56.92% | $3,201,106 | $3,289,835 | $57,622,331 | 6,748 | 1,511h | 1.0x |
| 12 | CASHCAT | $0.1686521 | +1.04% | +3.57% | $10,197,680 | $2,356,263 | $165,599,913 | 110,408 | 1,709h | 4.3x |
Turnover = 24h volume ÷ main-pool liquidity. Our feed returned null for holdersCount / top1Percent / top10Percent today (upstream 403), so holder counts come from OpenSea token pages (fetched 2026-09-11) and there is no concentration data available today.
Golden dogs: both are "official narrative" plays
$JUGGERNAUT +379.29%: the rally was a search page
Why it pumped: On 2026-09-10 Robinhood added searchable asset pages for JUGGERNAUT and FRONG. Per crypto.news (2026-09-10), JUGGERNAUT ran +500% within an hour before settling near +380%, with 24h volume up more than 3,000%. On-chain: 21,955 buys vs 20,807 sells (1.06) and 4,592 distinct buyers — a crowd, not one whale.
Case for more upside: main pool $743,860, token-wide $1,737,056 across 20 pools — enough to absorb mid-size entries. 1h still +18.36% with a 1h buy/sell ratio of 1.62. 22,398 holders (OpenSea). And it's a 1,767-hour-old pool (created 2026-06-29), not a three-day-old shell.
Case against: 6h is already -12.80%. The 24h high was $0.0208; at $0.0119814 you are -42.4% from the top — the board says +379% while anyone who bought the high has lost nearly half. Turnover 35.6x is speculative churn, not accumulation. And the key point: an asset page is not a listing. Spot trading is not enabled, so the catalyst has already fully played out. There is no second shoe.
My call: I'm not chasing here. If you touch it, small size, a defined loss cap, and route through the main pool only. → See the JUGGERNAUT chart and trades
$FRONG +165.79%: the Uniswap designer's frog
Why it pumped: same event. Per crypto.news, FRONG climbed nearly 130%, printed an all-time high of $0.0164, and saw volume up over 1,300%. Its own backstory: public records indicate the contract was created by Uniswap product designer Zack Labadie on 2026-07-30, and the token later became tied to Uniswap's Robinhood Chain launchpad pools.trade (see CoinGecko's FRONG page).
For: main pool $1,118,624 (third-deepest on the board) and its fee tier is just 0.25% — the cheapest pool on today's board. 15,122 buys vs 14,122 sells, 3,773 distinct buyers, 15,983 holders, 1h +17.14%.
Against: at $0.0089071 it sits -45.7% below its ATH. 6h -2.65%, and the 1h buy/sell ratio is only 0.80 (261 buys / 327 sells). One of its 20 pools is FRONG/USDG 4.69%, holding $136,068 but doing just $638 of 24h volume — liquidity that does nothing for your slippage.
Call: structurally healthier than JUGGERNAUT (deeper pool, lower fee) but in the same post-catalyst spot. → See FRONG's pools and holders
$WALLET +56.92%: the only chart that looks like accumulation
WALLET (Robinhood Wallet) isn't a golden dog, but its shape is the most unusual on the board: token-wide liquidity $4,069,925 against $3,300,019 of 24h volume — turnover of just 0.81x, the lowest here. Transaction buy/sell ratio 1.26, the highest here. 1,511-hour-old pool, 6,748 holders (OpenSea).
The catch: 680 unique buyers vs 845 unique sellers (0.81), and 6h is -1.88%. It also has $694,299 parked in four high-fee or zero-volume pools — including a 3.688% pool holding $576,863 that traded $373 in 24h, and a 20% pool holding $19,627 that traded $29. You think you have $4M of depth; you actually have the main pool's $3.34M. → See WALLET
$CHUMP +20.65%: the only token green on 1h, 6h and 24h
+3.40% / +40.65% / +20.65% — all three frames positive, and it's alone in that. A 1,006-hour-old pool, liquidity up from $1,221,327 to $1,386,335 (+13.5%), turnover only 4.0x, 11,188 holders. Its OpenSea listing claims 0% tax, a renounced contract and locked liquidity (project's own claim, not independently verified).
Risk: buy/sell ratio 0.95 and unique buyers/sellers 0.78 — price is up but more addresses are selling. → See CHUMP
Wipeout of the day: SIH -96.61%, 3,416 buyers, 170 holders left
Stonks In Hood (SIH) is the cleanest manufactured-volume sample I've seen on this chain:
- 25 hours old, main-pool liquidity $5,091, market cap $3,627
- 24h volume $858,970 — turnover 168.7x, and 236.8x its entire market cap
- 3,416 unique buyers and 3,542 unique sellers in 24h, but OpenSea shows only 170 holders right now
- Last hour: $0 volume, 0 buys, 0 sells — nobody left
- 10 pools, 7 of them charging between 5% and 85%
A token with a $3,600 market cap traded $860,000 in a day, had thousands of addresses buy it, and now has 170 holders. Those numbers argue for themselves: this looks like wash volume, not real turnover. Zero public project information — the OpenSea description is literally "just stonks in hood".
Also on the watch list: ASHIBA -63.26% (volume collapsed from $1,094,414 to $190,501, -82.6%; nobody is minding it); PYRE -45.02% (53h old, only 260 buys and 167 unique buyers in 24h); KERMIT is +49.62% on 24h but -30.01% in the last hour.
Yesterday's golden dogs, one day later: all three down
| Token | 09-10 24h | 09-11 24h | Liquidity | Two-day total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PONIE | +175.42% | -38.39% | $43,923 → $37,908 (-13.7%) | +69.7% |
| ROBIN | +134.32% | -24.91% | $297,973 → $245,806 (-17.5%) | +76.0% |
| RECEIPT | +112.99% | off the board | no public data | no public data |
ROBIN sits -65.3% below its ATH of $0.0258 (2026-09-06), with 1h -14.82%, 6h -32.03% and a buy/sell ratio of 0.68. PONIE's volume actually rose 77.8% ($929,252 → $1,652,443) while price fell 38.39% — rising churn plus falling price is distribution.
Wealth effect: $100 for a day → a $94.68 median
Backward-looking, not a forecast. Buy $100 of each of the 12 board tokens 24 hours ago ($1,200 total) and you now hold $1,593.43 (+32.8%). Which sounds great until you check the median: $94.68 — a loss.
- Best: JUGGERNAUT $100 → $479.29
- Second: FRONG $100 → $265.79
- Worst: SIH $100 → $3.39
- 6 up, 6 down
Strip out JUGGERNAUT and the remaining $1,100 becomes $1,114.15 — up 1.3%. The entire basket return is one token. If you didn't own that one yesterday, your $100 is that $94.68.
Three rules you can use today
- Ignore the board's percentage; check the pool you're about to trade. JUGGERNAUT has 20 pools, two of which were created on 09-10 at 12:43 and 12:57 — after the pump started. JUGGERNAUT/USDG 0.989% (liq $64,530, vol $782,009) is -44.95% on 24h; JUGGERNAUT/WETH 1.003% (liq $36,202, vol $548,125) is -30.08%. Same token: main pool +373%, those two pools -45% and -30%, on $1,330,134 of combined volume.
- Treat turnover above 50x as wash volume. SIH 168.7x, PONIE 43.6x. Versus CHUMP 4.0x and WALLET 1.0x. Deep pool + low churn + rising price is the hardest combination to fake.
- When 1h and 24h disagree, believe 1h. KERMIT is +49.62% on 24h and -30.01% on 1h. ROBIN is -24.91% on 24h but already -32.03% on 6h. The 24h number is history; 1h is now.
All three are visible in one screen on the BigPump Robinhood Chain hot-token pages — chart, trade tape, pool list and holder movement together.
New launches watch list (10 today, all under an hour old)
Combined liquidity $55,148, combined volume $26,877 — small pools all round. More ticker collisions today: two different SWIFTIEPHYLUS contracts and three Galaxy-family contracts (Grok Bot Galaxy ×2 plus bot galaxy). Verify the address before you buy.
- SWIFTIEPHYLUS +80.03%, liq $6,247 (the other same-name contract: -14.48%, liq $7,293)
- ZERO +31.38%, liq $10,163 — deepest of today's new pools
- GALAXY (Grok Bot Galaxy) +8.56%, liq $5,080
- CINDER +2.71% / ART -1.64% / BOT GALAXY -1.96% / TRC -4.95%
- NUL0 -48.88%, liq $4,053 — worst of the day
For calibration: of yesterday's 10 new launches, zero are up 24 hours later. Combined liquidity $56,857 → $48,215 (-15.2%), the best performer is RHC at -6.50%, the worst is ORBIT at -68.23% (it was +321.59% yesterday), and three pools did roughly $0 of volume. That's the expected value of zero-hour launches, in numbers.
FAQ
Did Robinhood actually list JUGGERNAUT and FRONG?
No spot listing. Robinhood added searchable asset pages (market-data pages). crypto.news states plainly that these are "not confirmed spot-market listings" and spot trading is not enabled. CoinGape quotes Myriad Markets co-founder Farokh Sarmad: "Basically, all they make is asset pages on Robinhood and you can search the coin, it's not a listing." The only Robinhood Chain memecoin with actual spot trading on Robinhood is CASHCAT.
Can I still chase JUGGERNAUT today?
For: $743,860 main pool ($1,737,056 token-wide), 1h +18.36%, 1h buy/sell 1.62, 22,398 holders, a 74-day-old pool. Against: 6h -12.80%, -42.4% from the 24h high, 35.6x turnover, unique sellers outnumber unique buyers, concentration unknown, catalyst already spent. Both sides are above. Not investment advice — memecoins can go to zero.
Why is there no top-10 concentration data today?
The upstream holder endpoint returned 403 for a second consecutive day, so holdersCount / top1Percent / top10Percent are all null in our feed. Holder counts in the table come from OpenSea token pages (different methodology); concentration is not available today. For how to judge a token without it, see our method piece.
What turnover ratio counts as dangerous?
Today's distribution: SIH 168.7x (-96.61%), PONIE 43.6x (-38.39%), JUGGERNAUT 35.6x, FRONG 16.6x, CHUMP 4.0x (+20.65%), WALLET 1.0x (+56.92%). Above roughly 50x, treat it as wash trading or extreme speculation. Under 10x with a deep pool is the relatively healthy shape.
How do I launch my own token here?
BigPump is the Tax-NFT bonding-curve launchpad on Robinhood Chain (chainId 4663): launch in one click, no code and no initial liquidity of your own. Once cumulative real ETH hits 4 ETH the token graduates automatically, a Uniswap V2 pool is created and the LP is burned to the dead address. The curve phase charges only a 1% pool fee; creator tax (1/3/5/10%, split four ways across treasury / burn / dividends / liquidity) and holder dividends apply after graduation. Mechanics: BigPump docs.
All on-chain figures come from the 2026-09-11 00:09 UTC Robinhood Chain snapshot, with pool detail from 00:20–00:35 UTC; holder counts are from OpenSea token pages (fetched 2026-09-11, different methodology from pool data). This is data reporting and method, not investment advice. Memecoins are extremely volatile and can go to zero.
Disclaimer: memecoins are extremely volatile and most go to zero. This article is not financial advice. Do your own research and only spend what you can afford to lose.