$MUSEBOOK Day Three: Liquidity Triples
- Third day on the board at +186.24%, with DexScreener token-wide liquidity going $864,826 to $2,549,829
- Buy/sell ratio 0.65 (17,053 buys, 26,320 sells) and 3,429 distinct sellers against 3,294 buyers — distribution
- musebook.lol still publishes no contract address after three days; the main pool is paired against tokenized Meta stock
$MUSEBOOK is the second golden dog on today's Robinhood Chain hot list at +186.24% over 24 hours, and this is its third straight day on the board.
When it arrived two days ago at +1,203.73%, my read was "sell-side flow, site does not mention the token, be careful." Two days on, one thing has changed, and changed conspicuously: its liquidity went from $864,826 to $2,549,829, close to triple. Two other things have not changed at all.
Snapshot time 2026-09-18 00:08:32 UTC for the on-chain figures, with DexScreener and GeckoTerminal detail pulled 00:20–00:50 UTC.
Three-day comparison
| Metric | 09-17 | 09-18 |
|---|---|---|
| 24h change | +1,203.73% | +186.24% |
| Price | — | $0.00012000 |
| 1h / 6h | — | +10.92% / -15.65% |
| Liquidity (pack main pool) | $1,238,628 | $2,788,482 |
| Liquidity (DexScreener token-wide) | $864,826 | $2,549,829 |
| 24h volume | — | $14,396,193 |
| 24h buys / sells | 37,060 / 54,883 | 17,053 / 26,320 |
| Buy/sell ratio | 0.68 | 0.65 |
| Distinct buyers / sellers | 4,425 / 4,442 | 3,294 / 3,429 |
| Market cap / liquidity | — | 4.30x |
| Age | 18 hours | 42 hours |
| Site publishes contract? | No | Still no (day three) |
What improved: the pools are getting deeper
Token-wide liquidity went from $864,826 to $2,549,829 in two days, close to triple. That deserves its own paragraph, because it is the opposite shape to a rug — tokens that run drain their pools, they do not fatten them.
Broken out by pool, on GeckoTerminal's numbers:
| Pool | DEX label | Liquidity | 24h volume | 24h change | Created (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| musebook / META | bankr-robinhood | $2,790,033 | $14,412,311 | +203.76% | 09-16 05:51 |
| musebook / WETH (v3, 1%) | uniswap-v3 | $675,473 | $6,530,256 | +198.63% | 09-16 08:27 |
| musebook / USDG (v4, 3%) | uniswap-v4 | $659,666 | $2,712,123 | +206.05% | 09-16 06:43 |
| musebook / USDG (v4, 1.62%) | uniswap-v4 | $98,108 | $973,293 | +199.03% | 09-16 08:20 |
| Agrippa / musebook | bankr-robinhood | $57,718 | $176,086 | -9.34% | 09-17 16:01 |
| musebook / WETH (v4, 1%) | uniswap-v4 | $39,857 | $161,536 | -11.67% | 09-17 15:04 |
The main pool is still musebook/META — paired against tokenized Meta stock, tagged bankr-robinhood on GeckoTerminal (launched through the Bankr agent). Crypto Briefing reported that Bankr has supported stock-token-quoted launches since July (source).
Its market cap to liquidity ratio is 4.30x, the lowest of any non-stablecoin on the board today (compare CASHCAT at 82.33x, PONS at 52.32x, ROBIN at 24.45x). The lower that multiple, the larger the share of the paper market cap that could actually be realised. On today's list that is MUSEBOOK's strongest single number.
A new wrinkle: MUSEBOOK is now a quote asset for another token
Look at the second-to-last row: Agrippa / musebook, created 09-17 16:01, $57,718 of liquidity. Note the ordering — musebook is the quote asset in that pool, the role WETH or USDG plays elsewhere.
This is another instance of memecoins pricing memecoins, a pattern we catalogued on September 14 (富贵, BLAST, ROBIN and RAXOL all did it). The consequence is concrete: Agrippa's price now hangs off musebook, so if musebook falls, Agrippa's dollar quote collapses with it regardless of anything Agrippa does. If the token you hold is quoted in another memecoin, you are running two layers of leverage whether you meant to or not.
What did not change: sell-side flow, and a site that still will not name the contract
First, the buy/sell ratio barely moved. 0.68 yesterday, 0.65 today, with 3,429 distinct sellers against 3,294 buyers. Price rising on sell-side dominance is textbook distribution, and it is now two days running.
Worth noting that this is the mirror image of WALLET today, which had more buyers and fell 73%. MUSEBOOK has more sellers and is rising. Neither shape is healthy, but they mean different things — WALLET is one party distributing to many, while MUSEBOOK is many holders selling into strength that the bid is still absorbing. While it absorbs, you get a rally. The moment it stops, you get that 6h -15.65%.
Second, the site still publishes no contract address. I opened musebook.lol for the third day. It is a community town for AI agents called "muses": channels like #lobby, #townhall and #memecoins, music via museic.lol, portraits via musegram.lol, a demo night, a sysop (wynjr). The site does mention "bankr" (for claiming unclaimed LP and trading fees) and a Robinhood RPC in passing. But the only token-related line anywhere is a proposal to price a pinned auction slot in "$musebook" and burn it — no contract address, no token economics, no announcement.
That does not make it fake. The product plainly exists. It does mean: you cannot demonstrate that the contract you bought was issued by the people who run that site. Compare today's $AD, whose site prints the contract in its body text and links a chart pointing at the same main pool. The gap is stark. The method for checking is in Two Artificial Doges.
Is it buyable?
For:
- Token-wide liquidity went from $864,826 to $2,549,829 in two days
- Market cap / liquidity of 4.30x, the lowest non-stablecoin on the board
- 1h +10.92%, still being pushed short-term
- The product (musebook.lol) is real and actively updated
- A $2,790,033 main pool can absorb a mid-size entry and exit
Against:
- Two straight days with a buy/sell ratio under 0.7 (0.65 today) and more distinct sellers than buyers
- 6h -15.65% — the move is giving back
- Third day with no contract on the site, so the link between project and token is unverifiable
- The main pool is quoted in tokenized META, so you carry that price exposure too
- Holder count and top-10 concentration: no public data
- A pool now quotes another token in musebook (Agrippa), stacking leverage on top of it
My call: more interesting than it was two days ago, still not a shape I would chase. Two things would change my mind: the site publishing the contract, or the buy/sell ratio getting back above 1. Neither happened today. Not investment advice — memecoins can go to zero.
FAQ
Is tripling liquidity a good sign?
It leans positive — a rug drains pools rather than deepening them. But who added the liquidity, and for how long, is not visible in the available feeds, so it counts as "does not look like a rug", not as "safe".
Why is the price up when more people are selling?
That is distribution: holders selling into strength while the bid still absorbs it. When it stops absorbing you get drops like the 6h -15.65%.
Is musebook.lol the same project as this token?
Unverifiable. The site has gone three days without publishing a contract address, and its only token-related text is a proposal to price auction slots in "$musebook". The "website" field on market data sites is project-submitted, not verified.
What does pairing against tokenized META mean for me?
Your dollar quote moves with both musebook and tokenized META. A stock token is not equity and does not imply any right to redeem the underlying.
Where do I watch it live?
The $MUSEBOOK trading page has the chart, trade feed and holder distribution. Today's full board is in the September 18 hot tokens report, today's other golden dog is covered in What Is $AD, and launch mechanics are at book.bigpump.ai.
BigPump is an independent project, not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Robinhood Markets, Inc.; the tokenized META referenced here is unrelated to Meta Platforms, Inc. On-chain figures from the 2026-09-18 00:08:32 UTC snapshot plus queries taken 00:20–00:50 UTC. Not investment advice — memecoins can go to zero.
Disclaimer: memecoins are extremely volatile and most go to zero. This article is not financial advice. Do your own research and only spend what you can afford to lose.