Yesterday's 10 New Launches: One Is Up 24 Hours Later
- Only 1 of 10 new launches is up a day later; combined liquidity -28.4%
- NASDAQ: liquidity -75.8%, price -55.02%, yet $149,118 of volume
- Four barely trade at all; eight launched with $3,373–$4,471 — one template
Yesterday (2026-09-09) our daily report listed 10 zero-hour new launches on Robinhood Chain. I looked up every one of them 24 hours later:
One of the ten is up. Combined liquidity fell from $56,674 to $40,550 (-28.4%). None of them made today's top-12 hot board.
This is the second time we have marked our own homework this way: the Sep 5 list came in at 1/10 as well. Two batches, one in ten each time. Data: 2026-09-10, 00:09 and 00:20 UTC.
Ten new tokens, 24 hours later
| Token | Liquidity y'day | Liquidity today | Change | 24h price | 24h volume | Pools |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RCHAR | $6,444 | $5,143 | -20.2% | +107.82% | $6,278 | 1 |
| MEIMEI | $4,372 | $4,337 | -0.8% | 0.00% | $0 | 1 |
| MONEY | $3,373 | $3,276 | -2.9% | -2.10% | $450 | 1 |
| BIRDR | $4,269 | $4,105 | -3.8% | -2.92% | $590 | 1 |
| PERP | $4,254 | $4,136 | -2.8% | -3.58% | $8,538 | 1 |
| RAMCN | $4,370 | $4,081 | -6.6% | -5.77% | $128 | 1 |
| BOOBINHOOD | $4,471 | $4,092 | -8.5% | -7.67% | $239 | 1 |
| $TINAW | $4,196 | $3,938 | -6.1% | -22.24% | $8,730 | 1 |
| YES | $3,572 | $3,249 | -9.0% | -36.04% | $6,249 | 1 |
| NASDAQ | $17,353 | $4,193 | -75.8% | -55.02% | $149,118 | 1 |
| Total | $56,674 | $40,550 | -28.4% | — | $180,320 | 10 |
$100 into each — $1,000 total — is worth $972.48 (-2.75%), with a median of $95.33. That looks mild only because most of these barely trade. An asset that does not move is not a safe asset; it is an asset with no bid.
Finding 1: NASDAQ, yesterday's best-funded launch, lost 76% of its pool
NASDAQ stood out on yesterday's list: $17,353 of liquidity (three to five times the rest), +37.0% on the day, $16,992 of volume. It looked like the one launch someone had actually funded.
Today:
- Liquidity $17,353 → $4,193 (-75.8%)
- Price -55.02%
- 24h volume $149,118 — 8.8x yesterday, and 83% of the entire list's volume
Volume exploding while liquidity is cut by three quarters and the price halves is a very legible combination. Money came in, money went out, and it took most of the pool with it. $149,118 changed hands in a day and $4,193 remains. The data will not name who sold into whom, but the pool records the outcome.
We covered the general meaning of this shape on Sep 7 in volume up, liquidity down: volume is money passing through, liquidity is money that stayed.
Finding 2: four of them barely trade at all
- MEIMEI: $0 of 24h volume, 0.00% price change, pool still there at $4,337
- RAMCN: $128
- BOOBINHOOD: $239
- MONEY: $450
Those four did $817 between them in a day. Tokens like this never crash dramatically — they just stop having anyone around. The practical consequence for a trader is worse than a 50% drop: you may not be able to sell at all, because there is no counterparty for your stop.
A usable test: 24 hours after launch, if 24h volume is under 20% of the pool (turnover below 0.2x), the market never formed. Today those four sit at 0.00x, 0.03x, 0.06x and 0.14x.
Finding 3: eight of them launched with nearly identical liquidity
Yesterday's starting liquidity: $3,373 / $3,572 / $4,196 / $4,254 / $4,269 / $4,370 / $4,372 / $4,471 — plus $6,444 and $17,353.
Eight tokens clustered inside $3,373–$4,471. That almost certainly means one launch template: the same platform and the same default seeding amount.
Two uses for that observation:
- A new token with roughly $4,000 of liquidity is not evidence of commitment — it is evidence of a default setting. Do not read "has a pool" as a signal.
- The one worth a second look is the one that deviates from the template. Yesterday that was NASDAQ at 4x the template value. It is also today's worst performer. Deviation can mean someone is serious, or that someone prepared something bigger. Deviation earns a look, not a buy.
Finding 4: one pool each, no fragmentation
All ten still have exactly one pool. Compare that with today's hot board — CRUMBS at 20 pools, RECEIPT at 20, ROBIN at 20.
Pool fragmentation is a signal that somebody thinks a token is worth working: high-fee pools, empty pools for volume, coin-to-coin pools all require someone to deploy them. Nobody building trap pools around your token also means nobody thinks it is worth the gas.
The one that went up: RCHAR
RCHAR is +107.82%, the only gainer on the list. With three caveats:
- Liquidity went $6,444 → $5,143, i.e. down 20.2%
- 24h volume is only $6,278 — 1.2x turnover
- One pool, and no site or socials we could verify (no public data)
A doubling on a shrinking pool means the move happened on very thin depth. In a $5,143 pool, a single $500 sell is worth roughly 19% of price impact.
Three rules from this tracking
- The zero-hour list is a watchlist, not a buy list. Two batches, 1/10 each — and that one gainer did it on a thinning pool.
- At the 24-hour mark, read liquidity before price. All ten shrank today; the worst by 75.8%. On a shrinking pool, a percentage gain is paper.
- Cross off anything under 0.2x turnover. No volume means no exit.
Before picking from new launches, run the 5 on-chain metrics, then check today's list in the daily report.
FAQ
Why is the hit rate on new launches so low?
Two batches at 1/10 is far too small a sample to be a law. The mechanism is plausible enough though: a zero-hour token has no bid yet, initial pools are a few thousand dollars, and any real selling digs straight through.
Are any of these ten still worth watching?
RCHAR is the only one with price action, and its pool is shrinking with no verifiable project information. The other nine are either bleeding slowly or not trading. There is no public data supporting a fundamental view on any of them.
What happened with NASDAQ?
Verifiable facts: yesterday $17,353 of liquidity at +37.0%; today $4,193 (-75.8%), price -55.02%, $149,118 of 24h volume. Whether liquidity was deliberately pulled is not established by public evidence.
Where do I see new launches first?
We publish the list daily in the daily report; live charts are on the BigPump hot-token pages.
How much initial liquidity should I seed if I launch?
BigPump takes a different route: you do not seed liquidity at all. The bonding curve only graduates once it has accumulated 4 ETH of real ETH, then creates a Uniswap V2 pool with the LP burned. That 4 ETH line is itself the filter — it screens out exactly this class of $4,000 template launch. See book.bigpump.ai and the launch page.
Data from the 00:09 UTC snapshots of 2026-09-09 and 2026-09-10, plus per-token pool queries at 2026-09-10 00:20 UTC. Not investment advice — memecoins can go to zero.
Disclaimer: memecoins are extremely volatile and most go to zero. This article is not financial advice. Do your own research and only spend what you can afford to lose.