Yesterday's 10 Launches: Zero Green, -6.43%

Third day in a row, same result: of the 10 tokens that launched on Robinhood Chain yesterday (09-12), zero are up 24 hours later. Median -6.43%, and all 10 show zero trades in the last hour.

The tails are what stand out. Yesterday's deepest new pool, $ALT, went from $302,459 to $5.05. Yesterday's best performer, $DECAP (+103.62%), is down 93.70% today. The two that looked best yesterday are the two that fell hardest.

Data timestamps: the 00:09 UTC research packages for 2026-09-12 and 2026-09-13, plus pool-level pulls at 2026-09-13 00:15–00:45 UTC.

Yesterday's ten, 24 hours later

Zero green, median -6.43%, and 10 of 10 with no trades in the last hour. The two flat "0%" readings ($SHRKUP, $401K) are not consolidation — they did $1 and $3 of volume across the entire day. Nobody is trading them at all.

Three details worth keeping

1. The deepest pool produced the most complete zero

Five minutes after launch yesterday, $ALT held $302,459 of liquidity ($311,652 at pool level) on 14 buys and 0 sells — an order of magnitude deeper than a batch of four-to-five-thousand-dollar pools. Today the pool holds $5.05, and total volume over those 24 hours was $9,730 across a single sell. $9,730 of volume cannot move $300,000; the difference has to be a liquidity withdrawal. Full arithmetic: $311K liquidity to $5.05 in 24 hours.

2. The best performer came with an 81% fee pool

$DECAP's +103.62% was the only real gain on yesterday's list. Two of its four pools charge 81% and 80.273%, created 09-12 at 00:46:48 and 00:47:56 — minutes after the main pool. Today it is -93.70%. The same template shows up in today's $FRONTIER: five of nine pools at 80%+, all built inside four minutes, 24h -93.53% (post-mortem). This is the most reusable red flag we have found so far.

3. The reading we refused to trust yesterday turned out to be right

Yesterday $TX0 produced two conflicting readings: the research package said $23,827 of liquidity and +488.63% on 24h, while pool-level data said $4,190 and -2.32%. We logged it and declined to use it. Today's answer: $4,228 of liquidity, -3.57% on 24h — the pool-level reading was correct. Take the rule with you: aggregate numbers in a token's first 30 minutes are unreliable; go to pool level.

What three days of 0-for-10 actually means

String the days together: the 09-11 list had zero green after 24 hours; the 09-12 list had zero green and all ten stopped trading; yesterday's list is zero green, median -6.43%, all ten stopped. Thirty samples, zero up on day two.

That does not say new tokens can never be bought. It says picking at random from a 0-hour list has clearly negative expectancy. Today's two golden dogs ($CATGPT +344.78%, $PAIREX +3,249.96%) are both 18–24 hours old, so new pools obviously can run — but they are the two that survived out of dozens of daily launches, not what a random pick from the list produces.

The more workable version is to shift your entry: wait until a token leaves the 0-hour list, reaches the hot board, and has a pool structure and a buyer/seller head count you can actually read. You give up the first leg; you get data in exchange.

Today's ten launches (all 0 hours old)

What to watch:

• $THIRDTEST's $20,260 is not demand. The name literally reads THISISTHIRDTEST, and 24h volume is $2.56. Depth above the rest of the batch does not mean anyone wants it — $ALT already demonstrated yesterday that depth can be on loan.
• Three Pons-adjacent names ($PONS-KUN, $PONSONA, following $PONIE earlier in the week). Ecosystem-adjacent naming is everywhere on this chain; verify the contract before buying.
• Volumes are in the hundreds of dollars. The busiest of the batch did $1,077. At that level a handful of trades sets the price, and the percentage change carries no statistical meaning.

FAQ

So should I snipe new launches at all?

You can, as long as you accept you are on the low-probability tail. Thirty samples over three days with zero day-two gainers means you need a real information edge — knowing the deployer, or being on-chain in the first minutes of the pool. Without that, waiting for the hot board gives you more to work with. Not investment advice.

Why did some launches show higher liquidity on day two?

$FOREVER went from $0 to $4,149 and $SHRKUP from $4,498 to $4,513. Small moves like that are usually a pool added later or a valuation change from price moves, not inflows — check volume: $1,258 and $1 respectively over 24 hours.

How do I see new launches early?

We list ten every day and revisit them the next day. If you want to track your own, record three numbers at launch — liquidity, 24h volume, pool count and fee tiers — and compare them a day later. That is far more informative than watching the price. Today's full board: daily hot tokens report.

If I launch a token, how do I avoid looking like the next $ALT?

Make the liquidity unpullable. BigPump's bonding curve graduates automatically at 4 ETH, creates a Uniswap V2 pool and sends the LP to the burn address — nobody can withdraw it, including you. The curve phase charges a flat 1% pool fee. Launch page; mechanics at book.bigpump.ai.

BigPump is a Tax NFT launchpad on Robinhood Chain and an independent project — not affiliated with, endorsed or sponsored by Robinhood Markets, Inc. Figures come from the 2026-09-12 and 2026-09-13 snapshots and pool pulls and make no factual claim about anyone's intent. Not investment advice.

Disclaimer: memecoins are extremely volatile and most go to zero. This article is not financial advice. Do your own research and only spend what you can afford to lose.