$FRONTIER -93.5%: Five 80% Fee Pools in 4 Min
- A $9,290 pool produced $1,745,899 of volume — 187.9x turnover, the most extreme we have logged
- Five of nine pools charge 80%+ (83.037%, 81%, 80.867%, 80.273%, 80%), all built inside four minutes
- Same template as yesterday $DECAP (81% and 80.273% pools), which is down 93.7% today
$FRONTIER launched nine hours ago and is down 93.53% over 24h. The crash number is not the interesting part. The interesting part is its pool structure: within four minutes of the main pool being created, three more pools for the same token appeared charging fees above 80%. An hour later, two more. The same template showed up on $DECAP yesterday — and both tokens are now down more than 93%.
This is a 60-second check you can run before you click buy. Data timestamps: 2026-09-13 00:09 UTC (research package) and 00:15–00:45 UTC the same day (pool level).
The numbers first
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price / 24h | $0.000005404 / -93.53% |
| 1h / 6h | -1.91% / +59.03% |
| 24h volume | $1,745,899 |
| Liquidity (main pool / all 9 pools) | $9,290 / $9,409 |
| Market cap | $5,404 |
| Turnover | 187.9x |
| 24h buys / sells | 12,489 / 8,597 |
| 24h unique buyers / sellers | 4,302 / 3,843 |
| Age | 9 hours |
| Project information | No public data |
| Contract | 0x9e410f73143c08a6a61db99075ba77895b4ce858 |
A $9,290 pool produced $1,745,899 of volume — 187.9x turnover, past $STOCKTARD's 176.3x on 09-12 and the most extreme reading we have logged. 4,302 unique wallets cycled through a sub-$10,000 pool in nine hours.
The evidence: nine pools and their birth times
| Created (UTC) | Pool | Liquidity | 24h volume | 24h |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 09-12 14:48:38 | FRONTIER / WETH (main) | $9,290 | $1,745,899 | -93.53% |
| 09-12 14:48:38 | FRONTIER / WETH (a second pool, same pair) | $0 | $10,777 | 0% |
| 09-12 14:52:25 | FRONTIER / WETH 81% | $19 | $6 | -67.09% |
| 09-12 14:52:30 | FRONTIER / WETH 83.037% | $65 | $7 | -73.91% |
| 09-12 14:52:37 | FRONTIER / WETH 80.273% | $33 | $7 | -73.64% |
| 09-12 14:58:22 | FRONTIER / WETH 80.867% | $2 | $1 | +138.21% |
| 09-12 15:51:41 | FRONTIER / USDG 80% | $0 | $0 | -99.38% |
| 09-12 15:59:40 | FRONTIER / USDG 7% | $0 | $366 | -52.42% |
| 09-12 16:02:13 | FRONTIER / WETH 2% | $0 | $637 | -39.69% |
Read the timestamps. Main pool at 14:48:38; then 14:52:25, 14:52:30 and 14:52:37 — three pools charging 80%+ appearing within twelve seconds of each other, under four minutes after the main pool. That is not organic growth. That is somebody working through a checklist.
What an 80% fee pool is for
A pool's fee is the cut the liquidity provider takes from every swap. The normal range is 0.25%–1% (today: $PONIE's main pool 0.25%, $CHUMP's 1%, $CATGPT's main pool with no extra tier marked). 80% means that swapping $100 in that pool sends $80 to the LP.
So why does anyone trade there? Because most people never look at the pool. A wallet, an aggregator or a hand-pasted contract address can route into any pool that exists — and these 80% pools do have fills recorded against them (11 buys here, 5 there, 18 in another, all tiny). We cannot prove intent from on-chain data. We can state the shape: pools created in a batch minutes after the main pool, holding tens of dollars, charging 80%+, offer a buyer nothing.
One more detail worth remembering: at the same second as the main pool (14:48:38), a second FRONTIER/WETH pool appeared with $0 of liquidity but $10,777 of recorded volume across 13 buys and 0 sells. We logged this "empty pool with volume" pattern on 09-09 and 09-10 as well; it contaminates aggregated volume figures.
Same template: yesterday's $DECAP
Among yesterday's ten launches, $DECAP looked like the best of the batch: +103.62% on 24h with $7,746 of liquidity. Today it is -93.7% with $6,120. Two of its four pools charge 81% and 80.273%, created 09-12 at 00:46:48 and 00:47:56 — the same fee levels and the same "minutes after the main pool" timing as FRONTIER.
Looking further back: $LPAD carries four high-fee pools among its ten (88.282%, 70%, 20%, 20%), and $PONIE three among its five (89%, 21%, 20%). Those two are down 58.49% and 73.76% today. The sample is small, but it points one way.
The 60-second checklist
- List every pool for the token, not just the one you landed on. Tokens on this chain routinely have 10–20.
- Sort by fee and count how many are 20% or higher. Today's contrast: $CATGPT, 20 pools, highest fee 10% (clean); $FRONTIER, 9 pools, five at 80%+ (dangerous); $LPAD, four at 20%+ (warning).
- Check when those high-fee pools were created relative to the main pool. Minutes apart means a batch operation. Days apart may just be someone else being careless later.
- Compute turnover: 24h volume ÷ liquidity. Above 30x is churn. FRONTIER 187.9x, PAIREX 53.1x, PONIE 31.8x — against CATGPT at 1.9x.
- Check market cap ÷ liquidity. FRONTIER is at 0.6x today (a $5,404 cap against $9,290 of liquidity), meaning price has already fallen to the floor of its own pool.
- Confirm which pool your order will fill in. That single action is what protects your wallet. The BigPump trade page shows pools, candles and the trade tape together instead of making you dig through an explorer.
Common mistakes
- Reading only the 6h window. FRONTIER still shows +59.03% on 6h against -93.53% on 24h. Short windows print beautiful numbers during a bounce off the floor.
- Treating "lots of unique buyers" as bullish. 4,302 unique buyers sounds like a crowd, but inside a $9,290 pool that is roughly $2 of pool depth per buyer. Many people is not much money.
- Assuming "I'll just use the main pool". When the main pool is $9,290, the main pool is the risk. The fee pools are an extra layer on top.
- Averaging down. With market cap already below liquidity, further buying mostly becomes pool depth rather than price.
FAQ
Can $FRONTIER recover?
From the data: -1.91% on 1h, $9,290 of liquidity, a $5,404 market cap, no project information, five 80% fee pools. There is almost no supporting side; the only green is a +59.03% 6h dead-cat bounce. I would not touch it. Not investment advice.
Why are 80% fee pools allowed at all?
Pools on this chain allow custom fees. On the hot board alone we have seen 0.25%, 0.9%, 1%, 2%, 3.11%, 4.9%, 5%, 7%, 8%, 10%, 18.8%, 20%, 21%, 35.001%, 70%, 80%, 81%, 83.037%, 88.282% and 89%. The chain does not judge whether a setting is reasonable. That judgement is your job.
What is the fastest way to read a new token's pool structure?
Open the token's trade page — pools, depth, trade tape and chart on one screen. We also wrote up the pool fee fingerprint, which covers judging a token from fee tiers and pool counts alone when holder data is unavailable.
If I launch a token, how do I keep buyers out of this trap?
Keep the path simple. On BigPump the bonding-curve phase charges a flat 1% pool fee (95% platform / 5% creator); at 4 ETH of accumulated real ETH the token graduates automatically into a single Uniswap V2 pool with the LP sent to the burn address — one pool, a fixed fee, and liquidity that cannot be pulled. Creator tax (1/3/5/10%, split four ways across treasury, burn, dividends and liquidity) and holder dividends start after graduation. Launch page; details at book.bigpump.ai.
BigPump is a Tax NFT launchpad on Robinhood Chain and an independent project — not affiliated with, endorsed or sponsored by Robinhood Markets, Inc. All pool figures come from on-chain pulls at 2026-09-13 00:15–00:45 UTC. We make no factual claim about any pool creator's intent; we report verifiable shapes and timestamps. Not investment advice.
Disclaimer: memecoins are extremely volatile and most go to zero. This article is not financial advice. Do your own research and only spend what you can afford to lose.