Robinhood Chain Hot Tokens Sep 9: ASHIBA +613%Guide
- $ASHIBA +613.18% in 24h, ten hours old, the only golden dog
- $WORKS -91.95% and $RUBEN -99.37% over six hours, 4,704 buyers between them
- The seven overlapping tokens moved +0.5% on volume, -1.1% on liquidity
Robinhood Chain produced exactly one golden dog today: $ASHIBA (Artificial Shiba), up 613.18% in 24 hours, ten hours after its pool was created. On the same board, $WORKS fell 91.95% in six hours and $RUBEN fell 99.37% — with 4,704 distinct buyers between them.
Everything in between barely moved. The seven tokens that appeared on both yesterday's and today's board traded $49.32M against $49.06M yesterday: +0.5%. That is today's Robinhood Chain hot tokens report — extreme at both ends, frozen in the middle.
All on-chain figures come from a snapshot taken 2026-09-09 00:09 UTC, ETH = $2,486.93. The upstream holder endpoint returned 403 today, so holder counts and top-1 / top-10 concentration are unavailable and are not reported below.
Today's tape: the middle stopped moving
Yesterday the story was a violent contraction — volume across the overlapping tokens fell 49.9% while liquidity rose 16%. Today neither happened. The seven overlapping tokens (PAIR, ROBIN, CHUMP, PONS, SIRIUS, CASHCAT, AI) went from $49.06M to $49.32M in 24h volume (+0.5%), with liquidity moving from $37.62M to $37.22M (-1.1%).
Chain-wide the picture matches. GeckoTerminal shows Robinhood Chain at $2.06B in 24h volume across 8,016,535 transactions, against $2.07B and 8.6M transactions a day earlier. Volume flat, transaction count down roughly 7%, average ticket slightly larger.
Money did not leave. It concentrated at the edges: 5 of 12 tokens closed green over 24h, while a ten-hour-old token went up seven times and two sub-24-hour tokens went to near zero.
The board (2026-09-09 00:09 UTC)
| # | Token | Price | 1h | 6h | 24h | 24h vol | Liquidity | Mkt cap | Age | Turnover |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PAIR | $0.00905647 | -11.55% | -35.37% | -39.41% | $1,267,390 | $1,090,384 | $8,272,814 | 245h | 1.2x |
| 2 | ASHIBA | $0.00032216 | +1.52% | +45.85% | +613.18% | $934,392 | $132,005 | $322,161 | 10h | 7.1x |
| 3 | ROBIN | $0.00553979 | -10.19% | -14.22% | -31.30% | $1,138,418 | $192,993 | $5,547,392 | 79h | 5.9x |
| 4 | CHUMP | $0.03762015 | +4.01% | +6.25% | +3.57% | $2,679,614 | $1,163,709 | $37,612,841 | 958h | 2.3x |
| 5 | PONS | $0.78908161 | +1.53% | -3.37% | +10.14% | $27,823,651 | $8,607,787 | $562,294,061 | 1270h | 3.2x |
| 6 | WORKS | $0.00000451 | -10.14% | -91.95% | -91.95% | $587,400 | $7,057 | $4,510 | 6h | 83.2x |
| 7 | SIRIUS | $0.00101064 | -1.50% | -1.88% | -11.51% | $462,013 | $77,566 | $1,010,643 | 231h | 6.0x |
| 8 | RUBEN | $0.00000393 | +2.64% | -99.37% | -93.72% | $773,010 | $6,099 | $3,930 | 17h | 126.7x |
| 9 | AP | $0.00121848 | +6.42% | +38.40% | +26.86% | $713,372 | $102,695 | $1,218,484 | 133h | 6.9x |
| 10 | CASHCAT | $0.18717248 | -1.91% | +0.29% | -2.63% | $13,670,663 | $3,403,328 | $185,017,816 | 1661h | 4.0x |
| 11 | AI | $0.22614977 | -0.38% | -7.35% | -1.69% | $2,280,519 | $22,683,038 | $224,321,849 | 1350h | 0.1x |
| 12 | DELTA | $0.01596507 | -2.35% | +15.07% | +10.60% | $2,345,680 | $1,146,058 | $15,648,220 | 937h | 2.0x |
Board totals: $54.68M in 24h volume, $38.61M in liquidity. Both are main-pool figures. Aggregate every pool under each token and the volume total is $185.27M — 3.4x higher. More on that below, because it changes how you read half of these numbers.
$ASHIBA: why it ran, and whether you can still chase
Price $0.0003221611. Up 1.52% in the last hour, 45.85% over six, 613.18% over 24. Liquidity $132,005, 24h volume $934,392 (7.1x turnover), market cap $322,161. 4,955 buys against 3,148 sells; 1,095 distinct buyers against 909 sellers.
Why it ran. Its main pool is ASHIBA / NVDA — quoted against tokenized Nvidia stock — created 2026-09-08 14:23:58 UTC. That is not an original idea. It is the $AI (Artificial Inu) playbook, whose AI/NVDA pool was created on 2026-07-14 and holds $22,683,038 today, the deepest pool on the board. ASHIBA re-ran the "Artificial + dog + paired to NVDA" narrative in a $322,161 shell. At that market cap, a seven-bagger takes very little money.
The bull case. Green across 1h, 6h and 24h — the only token on the board that is. Market cap ÷ liquidity of 2.4x, third-lowest on the board (PONS is 65.3x). Turnover of 7.1x is hot but not the 83x and 127x you see on the two tokens that died today. Distinct buyers exceed sellers by 20%.
The bear case. Its website, artificialshiba.com, loads a single line of text — no contract address, no supply, no team. There is no independent third-party coverage of this token anywhere (searches for "Artificial Shiba" return a different ASHIBA on BNB Chain). It has 11 pools, seven of them with fees of 50% or more, topping out at 90%. And a ten-hour-old token has no history: yesterday's +2,506% headline token, the Robinhood Chain $LAPTOP copycat, is down 41.3% today and off the board entirely.
My read: main pool only, small size, stop loss set, pool address checked first. I would not size up at +45.85% on the six-hour. Chart and trades for $ASHIBA.
The Artificial family: the original is being sold, the clones are being bought
| Token | Main pool | Pool created | 24h | Liquidity | Mkt cap | Buyers/sellers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI (Artificial Inu) | AI / NVDA | 2026-07-14 | -1.69% | $22,683,038 | $224,321,849 | 0.59 |
| AP (Artificial Pepe) | AP / NVDA | 2026-09-03 | +26.86% | $102,695 | $1,218,484 | 0.97 |
| ASHIBA | ASHIBA / NVDA | 2026-09-08 | +613.18% | $132,005 | $322,161 | 1.20 |
Newer and smaller means bigger moves. Older and larger means distribution. $AI logged 1,759 buys against 3,639 sells today (0.48 ratio), 1,072 distinct buyers against 1,816 sellers (0.59), and 19 buys against 57 sells in the last hour. That is the second consecutive day of the same signal on a $224M token.
One sector risk worth writing down: according to defiprime's analysis of stock-paired memecoins (data as of 2026-09-01), Robinhood Chain's 90-day gas subsidy expires around early October. The entire high-turnover structure of this sector rests on near-zero gas.
Two tokens to zero: $WORKS and $RUBEN
$WORKS (it works) — six hours old, -91.95% over both 6h and 24h (the windows overlap because it is younger than a day). Liquidity $7,057, 24h volume $587,400, turnover 83.2x, market cap $4,510. 1,976 distinct buyers against 1,907 sellers.
$RUBEN (Ruben Hud) — 17 hours old, -99.37% over six hours, -93.72% over 24. Liquidity $6,099, volume $773,010, turnover 126.7x. 2,728 distinct buyers against 2,772 sellers.
The mechanism is in the numbers, no motive required. A $6,099 pool cannot absorb $773,010 of new money — so that volume is the same money bouncing inside the pool, paying slippage and fees on every bounce. By the time the last wave arrives, the ETH side is drained and any sell prints a double-digit drop.
Note that buyers ≈ sellers on both. This is not "some got out, some got stuck." Almost everyone who entered also exited — at a price nine-tenths lower. Both are now dead: $WORKS shows 4 buys and 2 sells in the last hour, $RUBEN 5 and 3.
The metric trap: $PAIR is buy-side dominant and down 39%
$PAIR sits at rank one today, but it got there by falling: -39.41% over 24h, -35.37% over six, -11.55% over one. Liquidity dropped from $1,550,054 to $1,090,384 (-29.7%).
Yet its buy/sell ratio is 1.57 (1,474 buys, 939 sells) and its buyer/seller ratio is 1.19 (751 buyers, 629 sellers). More buys, more buyers, price down 39%.
Compare with $ASHIBA: buy/sell ratio 1.57, buyer/seller ratio 1.20 — almost identical — and up 613%. Two tokens with the same order-flow ratios and opposite outcomes. That is proof those ratios cannot be used alone. Counts are not dollars. What tells you where the money went is the liquidity change: $PAIR's pool shrank by $459,670 in a day. $PAIR chart.
Wealth effect: $100 bought 24 hours ago
| Token | 24h | $100 is now |
|---|---|---|
| ASHIBA | +613.18% | $713.18 |
| AP | +26.86% | $126.86 |
| DELTA | +10.60% | $110.60 |
| PONS | +10.14% | $110.14 |
| CHUMP | +3.57% | $103.57 |
| AI | -1.69% | $98.31 |
| CASHCAT | -2.63% | $97.37 |
| SIRIUS | -11.51% | $88.49 |
| ROBIN | -31.30% | $68.69 |
| PAIR | -39.41% | $60.59 |
| WORKS | -91.95% | $8.05 |
| RUBEN | -93.72% | $6.28 |
Twelve $100 tickets, $1,200 in, $1,592.14 out — average $132.68, or +32.7%.
Remove $ASHIBA and the eleven remaining tickets are worth $878.96 on $1,100 — an average of $79.91, or -20.1%. The median is $97.84. Seven of twelve tokens are below cost. For the second day running, the entire positive return of the basket comes from the single golden dog on the board.
Three things to take from today's board
- Check the pool before you check the token. $ASHIBA has 11 pools; only ASHIBA/NVDA is real, holding 93.7% of its liquidity. Seven of the others charge 50%–90% in fees. Across the whole board, 8 tokens carry 22 pools with fees of 20% or more.
- Turnover above 20x is not an investment. $WORKS at 83.2x and $RUBEN at 126.7x both printed -91.95% and -99.37% the same day. Turnover is 24h volume ÷ liquidity, two numbers on the same screen.
- Do not trade on buy/sell counts. $PAIR and $ASHIBA had the same ratios and opposite results. Use the daily liquidity change to see where the money actually went.
New listings watchlist (all 0 hours old)
Ten new tokens today, $56,675 in combined liquidity (average $5,668, up from $4,775 yesterday), and zero 24h volume across all of them — pools created, nobody trading yet. The largest is NASDAQ (Nasdaq Earn) at $17,352.77, 2.7x the second-place rChar ($6,444.03). Then Boobinhood $4,471, 美美 $4,372, RAMCOON $4,370, BirdR $4,269, PerpStock $4,254, notawebsite $4,196, will this coin go up $3,572, Robinhood Religion $3,373.
Reminder from yesterday's list: it contained two tokens called BF4 with completely different contract addresses. Read addresses, not names.
FAQ
Was there a golden dog on Robinhood Chain today?
One: $ASHIBA, +613.18% over 24h with $132,005 in liquidity (threshold: ≥ +100% and ≥ $20k liquidity). Snapshot 2026-09-09 00:09 UTC.
Is $ASHIBA connected to $AI (Artificial Inu)?
No public evidence of any connection. The AI/NVDA pool was created 2026-07-14 with $22,683,038 in liquidity; the ASHIBA/NVDA pool was created 2026-09-08 14:23 UTC with $132,005. They share a naming convention and a quote asset, nothing verifiable beyond that.
Can $WORKS or $RUBEN be bought back at the bottom?
Their pools hold $7,057 and $6,099 and show single-digit trade counts in the last hour. At that depth a few hundred dollars moves the price double digits in either direction. Nothing on-chain supports a bottom-fishing case.
Why does volume for these tokens differ between sites?
Different scope. This board reports the main pool. Aggregated across all pools, $AI traded $28,365,909 in 24h versus $2,280,519 in its main pool — a 12.4x gap. We cover this in a separate piece.
What does BigPump charge to launch a token?
On the bonding curve, a 1% pool fee (95% platform / 5% creator). At 4 ETH of cumulative real ETH the token graduates automatically, a Uniswap V2 pool is created and the LP tokens are sent to the burn address; graduation takes a one-time 5% of pool ETH. Creator tax (1/3/5/10%) and holder dividends apply only after graduation. See the BigPump docs or launch a token.
All on-chain figures from the 2026-09-09 00:09 UTC snapshot; holder metrics unavailable today. Not investment advice — memecoins can go to zero.
Disclaimer: memecoins are extremely volatile and most go to zero. This article is not financial advice. Do your own research and only spend what you can afford to lose.