Robinhood Chain Hot Tokens Sep 13: CATGPT +345%
- Two golden dogs: CATGPT +344.78% on a $7.4M main pool, PAIREX +3,249.96% on a $95,714 pool
- Chain-wide 24h volume $1.79B, -37.63%; the hot-12 slice fell from $104.94M to $43.37M
- $100 look-back median $88.30, worst in four days; $FRONTIER -93.53% with five 80% fee pools
Robinhood Chain printed two golden dogs today: $CATGPT +344.78% and $PAIREX +3,249.96% over 24h. And yet the median outcome on this board was a loss. Chain-wide volume fell from $2.86B to $1.79B (-37.63%), and $100 spread across the 12 hot tokens a day ago would be worth a median of $88.30 today — the worst reading in four days. Money is not flowing in; it is rotating hard into two 24-hour-old pools.
Data timestamp: research package 2026-09-13 00:09 UTC; pool-level figures pulled the same day 00:15–00:45 UTC. ETH = $2,526.28.
Today's tape: chain-level outflow, two new pools soaking it up
GeckoTerminal's chain page shows 24h volume of $1.79B, -37.63%, across 8,300,756 transactions (source, pulled 2026-09-13). Our hot-12 slice did $43.37M versus $104.94M yesterday, down 58.7%. Of that $43.37M, CATGPT and PAIREX — both under 24 hours old — account for $14.49M.
The older names are bleeding: $CHUMP volume -60.7%, $FLYBRAIN -87.7%, $PONS down from $23.87M to $8.85M. Chasing the old names makes no sense in this structure, and chasing the new ones has its own bill attached: today's worst performer, $FRONTIER, is down 93.53% nine hours after launch.
The board (12 tokens)
| # | Token | Price | 1h | 6h | 24h | 24h vol | Liquidity | Mkt cap | Buys/Sells | Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | $PONIE | $0.00002235 | -24.96% | -39.48% | -73.76% | $298,574 | $9,382 | $22,347 | 5026/4749 | 140h |
| 2 | $CHUMP | $0.03914 | +4.85% | -2.80% | -10.06% | $1,166,977 | $1,274,613 | $39,143,772 | 3456/5813 | 1054h |
| 3 | $ROBIN | $0.005213 | -13.18% | -36.62% | -43.93% | $647,790 | $186,731 | $5,206,164 | 1480/1878 | 175h |
| 4 | $CATGPT | $0.01133 | +4.28% | +20.69% | +344.78% | $9,412,697 | $7,435,001 | $11,341,688 | 10128/17264 | 24h |
| 5 | $FLYBRAIN | $0.009401 | -0.54% | -5.66% | -13.35% | $5,568,378 | $703,611 | $9,400,730 | 5801/5664 | 51h |
| 6 | $AI | $0.2986 | +4.98% | -4.89% | +15.76% | $2,418,262 | $29,564,675 | $295,979,830 | 1806/3189 | 1446h |
| 7 | $PONS | $0.5965 | -0.27% | +0.60% | +1.92% | $8,851,815 | $8,783,436 | $424,740,219 | 5291/5477 | 1366h |
| 8 | $PAIREX | $0.001347 | +49.80% | +39.40% | +3,249.96% | $5,081,641 | $95,714 | $1,347,290 | 15054/12735 | 18h |
| 9 | $ZZZ | $0.0603 | -0.98% | -9.06% | +29.27% | $5,430,131 | $618,767 | $45,123,920 | 4034/4044 | 192h |
| 10 | $LPAD | $0.000556 | -3.64% | +15.89% | -58.49% | $1,053,634 | $91,729 | $538,111 | 3919/2684 | 53h |
| 11 | $FRONTIER | $0.000005404 | -1.91% | +59.03% | -93.53% | $1,745,899 | $9,290 | $5,404 | 12489/8597 | 9h |
| 12 | $CME | $0.004736 | +19.47% | +21.54% | -26.23% | $1,698,547 | $688,986 | $4,710,451 | 1472/780 | 119h |
Holder counts and top-10 concentration are null for the fourth day running (the upstream holder endpoint returns 403). Every concentration call below uses substitutes instead: turnover, market cap ÷ liquidity, unique-buyer/seller ratio, and the pool count and fee spread.
$CATGPT: +344.78%, but its deepest pool is quoted in a perp wrapper
Why it pumped. It is a day-old token with an AI-plus-cat narrative. CoinGecko lists it as launched 2026-09-12, all-time high $0.01929, 1B total supply (source). What actually pulled money in is depth: the main pool CATGPT / OPENAIx1L holds $7,427,681, and across 20 pools the token carries $7,781,030 of liquidity on $14,701,381 of 24h volume. A new launch with that much depth is rare on this chain.
Can it continue — the supporting side. Green across all three windows (+4.28% / +20.69% / +344.78%). Turnover is only 1.9x token-wide, so this is not pure churn. Market cap ÷ liquidity is 1.5x, the healthiest number on the board.
The risk side, which I weight more. 24h buys 10,128 versus sells 17,264; unique buyers 1,707 versus sellers 2,463 — a 0.69 head-count ratio. Price up, wallets distributing. And the quote asset matters: OPENAIx1L is not a stock. It is Long.xyz wrapping a 1x long Lighter perp position into an ERC-20. BlockTempo's 2026-09-12 breakdown put on-chain volume for that family at $20.01M against just $68K of underlying perp liquidity — a 294x gap — with price dispersion of up to 25.8% between pools (source). Buying CATGPT in that pool means wearing that risk too. Full breakdown: CATGPT's deepest pool is priced in a perp wrapper.
Call. Depth is real, so a small probe is defensible; treating it as safe is not. The thing to watch is whether the head-count ratio climbs back above 1. Chart, trades and holders for CATGPT.
$PAIREX: +3,249.96% and 20 pools in 18 hours
Why it pumped. An 18-hour-old launchpad token. Pairex describes itself as a way to launch any token against any forex quote currency (X: @pairexmarket; the contract matches the on-chain one). Short-window momentum is the strongest on the chain: +49.80% on 1h, +39.40% on 6h.
The risk side. The main pool holds $95,714 and printed $5.08M of volume. Token-wide, 20 pools hold $214,210 and did $10,708,576 — 50x turnover. In that structure a $1,000 market order moves the price by itself, in both directions. All 20 pools were created inside five hours, almost all quoted in USDG, and the 24h readings across fee tiers (1%, 3%, 5%, 7%, 8%) range from +335% to -68%. Which pool you buy in decides your cost basis.
Call. This is only for someone who knows they are gambling: main pool only (trade page), size you will not miss, slippage set by hand. More: $PAIREX +3,250%: 20 pools in 18 hours.
$FRONTIER: -93.53% in nine hours — stay out
$1,745,899 of volume against $9,290 of liquidity is 187.9x turnover, with 4,302 unique buyers cycling through in nine hours. Five of its nine pools charge 80% or more (83.037%, 81%, 80.867%, 80.273%, 80% USDG), and all five were created within four minutes of the main pool (main at 14:48:38, traps at 14:52:25–14:52:37 UTC). No public project information exists. The 6h window still reads +59.03%; that does not make the shape tradable. Post-mortem: $FRONTIER -93.5%: five 80% fee pools in four minutes.
Yesterday's golden dogs, day two
$LPAD was +530.87% yesterday and is -58.49% today, with main-pool liquidity down from $129,286 to $92,410 (-28.5%) and 4 of its 10 pools charging 20% or more (including 88.282% and 70%). $FLYBRAIN's volume collapsed from $45.37M to $5.57M (-87.7%) and price fell 13.35% — yet main-pool liquidity rose from $670,560 to $703,611 (+4.9%). Someone added depth into the fade; that is the one contrarian signal on today's board. $PONIE completed the full arc: +175% on 09-10, -73.76% today, liquidity from $31,709 down to $9,382.
Wealth effect: $100 became a median $88.30
Back-calculated from the 24h change (a look-back, not a forecast) — $100 into each hot token 24 hours ago:
- Best: PAIREX $3,349.96, CATGPT $444.78, ZZZ $129.27
- Worst: FRONTIER $6.47, PONIE $26.24, LPAD $41.51
- 5 up, 7 down, median $88.30 (versus $101.13 on 09-12 and $94.68 on 09-11)
Put plainly: buy all 12 hot tokens blind and you are down about 12% today. The upside only exists if you picked the one or two. Detail: $100 for a day: $88.30 median.
How to actually use this board
- Read the pool count and fee spread before the percentage. FRONTIER has five 80% pools, LPAD four at 20%+, PONIE still carries an 89% pool. Those are structures that take most of your exit.
- Turnover = 24h volume ÷ liquidity. Above 30x is churn (PONIE 31.8x, PAIREX 53.1x, FRONTIER 187.9x). Below 2x means wallets are actually holding (CATGPT 1.9x).
- With no holder data, use the head-count ratio. Unique buyers ÷ unique sellers under 0.8 is distribution: CHUMP 0.67, CATGPT 0.69, AI 0.70 today.
- Know which pool you are in. The same token can read hundreds of percent apart across pools — true for both PAIREX and CATGPT today.
New launches watchlist (10, all 0 hours old)
- $HOTDOG (Slighty Used Hotdog), liq $5,658, +23.16%
- 肥脂小猫 (a Chinese-named cat token), liq $5,998, +37.40%
- $COMMONWARE liq $4,549, +3.46%; $STONKFARMER (Point Farmer Capital) liq $4,461, +2.19%
- $SASSYCAT liq $4,496, -0.09%; $PONSONA liq $3,352, -1.99%; $OMIKAMI (Amaterasu Omikami) liq $4,498, -5.91%
- $SPEKO (speko.ai) liq $4,393 and $PONS-KUN liq $4,334: both flat, essentially no trades
- $THIRDTEST (THISISTHIRDTEST), liq $20,260 but only $2.56 of 24h volume — the name says test; skip it
For calibration: of yesterday's ten launches, zero are up 24 hours later, the median is -6.43%, and $ALT went from $311,652 of liquidity to a $5.05 pool. Sniping 0-hour launches has had negative expectancy every day we have tracked it — see Yesterday's 10 launches: zero green.
FAQ
Which token is worth watching today?
On structure alone, $CATGPT: 1.9x turnover, 1.5x market cap ÷ liquidity, green on all three windows. That is not a recommendation — its 0.69 head-count ratio says wallets are distributing, and its quote asset is a perp wrapper.
Is it too late to buy $PAIREX?
Supporting side: green on 1h/6h/24h, 3,175 unique buyers, a launchpad narrative. Risk side: a $95,714 main pool, 50x turnover, and 20 pools splitting the depth. Both sides are on the table; position size is yours. Not investment advice — memecoins can go to zero.
Why are holder counts blank?
The upstream holder endpoint has been failing for four days and we do not invent numbers. The substitutes are turnover, market cap ÷ liquidity, head-count ratio and the pool fee spread — method here: No holder data? Read the pool fee fingerprint.
Where can I see charts and holders for these tokens?
BigPump's hot-token pages carry the chart, trades, holders and an in-page swap — paste the contract address. If you want to launch something instead, one-click launch needs no code, and the mechanics are documented at book.bigpump.ai.
BigPump is a Tax NFT launchpad on Robinhood Chain and an independent project — not affiliated with, endorsed or sponsored by Robinhood Markets, Inc. Every on-chain figure above comes from the 2026-09-13 00:09 UTC research package and same-day 00:15–00:45 UTC pool pulls. This is data, not investment advice; memecoins can go to zero.
Disclaimer: memecoins are extremely volatile and most go to zero. This article is not financial advice. Do your own research and only spend what you can afford to lose.