What Is 富贵? A 1,453-Hour Pool Up 1,843%
- The main pool dates to 2026-07-15, 1,453 hours old — an old pool relit, not a new launch
- Three readings for one token: main pool +1,805.89%, new USDG pool +106.40%, CoinGecko +30.20%
- Buyer/seller ratio 1.08 is the only one above 1.0 on the board; but 6h is -8.17% at 40.3x turnover
Short version: 富贵 took the number-one slot on Robinhood Chain today at 24h +1,843.42%, but it is not a new launch. Its main pool was created on 15 July 2026 and has been sitting there for 1,453 hours. This is an old pool getting relit, not a token starting from zero.
Data time 2026-09-14 00:09 UTC (pool-level data 00:10-00:20 UTC), from the BigPump research package. ETH = $2,478.08.
The numbers
| Metric | Value |
|---|---|
| Price | $0.00281733 |
| 1h / 6h / 24h | +12.49% / -8.17% / +1,843.42% |
| 24h volume (main pool) | $9,404,368 |
| Liquidity (main pool) | $233,286 |
| Liquidity (all 20 pools) | $431,516 |
| Volume (all 20 pools) | $12,697,300 |
| Market cap | $2,872,809 (mcap / liquidity 12.3x) |
| 24h txns / unique wallets | 17,816 buys / 14,323 sells; 4,425 buyers / 4,081 sellers (1.08) |
| Main pool age | 1,453 hours (created 2026-07-15T10:57:16Z) |
| Website / X / Telegram | DexScreener lists defiusdc.com (302-redirects to a PONS launchpad page); empty in our package |
Why it moved
The base was near zero. The 富贵/WETH 1% pool was created on 15 July and then largely ignored for two months. A pool with almost no trading sits at a depressed reference price, so when money arrives the percentage is four digits by construction. This is not "the project shipped something" — the denominator was tiny.
Participation is genuinely broad. 4,425 unique buyers and 17,816 buy transactions in 24 hours is not two wallets wash-trading. Turnover was 40.3x ($9,404,368 of volume against $233,286 of liquidity), meaning the float changed hands roughly forty times in a day.
New money built depth. Someone created a 富贵/USDG 2.5% pool at 02:04 UTC yesterday; it now holds $136,671, a third of all token-wide liquidity. Somebody was willing to fund a pool, which is not the pure pump-and-leave shape.
On the project itself: there is no independent project page, and the "website" field is a problem. Our research package has website, X and Telegram all empty. DexScreener's token info block — a field submitted by the token team itself — does list a website for 富贵: defiusdc.com. Visiting it returns a 302 redirect to a PONS launchpad page on pons-family.eu.com, pointed at 0x39dBED3a2bd333467115dE45665cC57F813C4571 — that is $PONS, today's number seven, not 富贵.
Two things stand out: defiusdc.com is a domain that reads like a stablecoin but is only a redirect, and it lands on a different token's launchpad page rather than anything describing 富贵. So this is not "has a website" so much as "a traffic link was filled in." The name is Chinese for "wealth and prosperity" and the logo is a puppy. Beyond that there is no published team, roadmap or supply figure. (DexScreener and the redirect both re-checked 2026-09-14.)
How to read that 1,843%: three sources, an order of magnitude apart
This is the part worth remembering. Same token, same 24-hour window:
| Source / pool | Pool created | Liquidity | 24h change |
|---|---|---|---|
| 富贵 / WETH 1% (main) | 2026-07-15T10:57:16Z | $233,785 | +1,805.89% |
| 富贵 / USDG 2.5% | 2026-09-13T02:04:17Z | $136,671 | +106.40% |
| CoinGecko (cross-venue) | — | $2.79M mcap | +30.20% |
(CoinGecko reading from the Robinhood Chain Meme category page, pulled 2026-09-14.)
The old pool measures from a two-month floor, so it prints +1,806%. The USDG pool built yesterday only covers the post-pump range, so it prints +106%. CoinGecko volume-weights across venues and flattens both into +30.2%.
What that means for you: "24h +1,843%" is not "you would have made 18x buying yesterday." That only holds if you were in the July WETH pool before the move. Anyone who bought in the USDG pool made roughly 2x. This is the second day running I have hit the same problem — two days ago it was $CATGPT at +344% versus +39.2%.
Can it keep going?
The case for:
- 1h is still +12.49%, one of the few names on the board still climbing.
- Unique buyers / sellers is 4,425 / 4,081 = 1.08 — the only token in the hot 12 above 1.0. All eleven others are distributing; this one still has more buyers than sellers.
- Token-wide liquidity of $431,516 is 1.9x the main-pool reading and deeper than same-day golden dogs BLAST or SWARM.
- Market cap / liquidity of 12.3x is on the low side today (PONS 50.2x, CHUMP 28.6x).
The risks:
- 6h is already -8.17%. The enormous 24h figure was earned earlier in the window; the last six hours have been a retrace.
- 40.3x turnover is speculative churn, not accumulation. When the flow stops there is nothing underneath the price.
- No real project information, and the "website" is a redirect. The defiusdc.com listed on DexScreener 302s to a PONS launchpad page rather than anything about 富贵. No team, roadmap or supply figure.
- 富贵 is already being used as a quote asset — there is a "冰淇淋 / 富贵 3%" pool holding $9,149. Its price is now referenced by another token, which means a collapse here propagates.
- Holder counts and top-10 concentration are unavailable (upstream 403 for a fifth day), so concentration cannot be checked directly.
My read: I would not chase the 1,843%. If I were watching it, the numbers I would watch are the USDG pool's +106%, the 1h +12.49%, and that buyer/seller ratio above 1.0 — together they say there is still real bid. But 6h negative, zero project information and 40x turnover stack up badly at this price. Not investment advice; memecoins can go to zero.
How to buy 富贵 on Robinhood Chain
- Bridge ETH to Robinhood Chain. chainId 4663, gas paid in ETH.
- Open the trade page. The BigPump hot-token page for 富贵 shows chart, trades and pools on one screen with an on-site swap.
- Confirm which pool you route into. This matters more than usual here: of 20 pools, the main holds $233,785 and the USDG pool $136,671, leaving $61,060 spread across the other eighteen — several of which charge 4.4%-5%. Do not let a router drop you in a small one.
- Slippage. At $233,785 of main-pool depth, 2%-5% is normally enough for a four-figure order. Do not push slippage into double digits just to get filled.
Risk checklist
- No public project information; no team or product claim can be verified.
- 24h change differs by an order of magnitude across three sources — the headline number misleads.
- 40.3x turnover: high-speculation churn structure.
- 6h already negative; the 1h bounce is not trend confirmation.
- Holder concentration data missing; whale concentration cannot be ruled out.
- Satellite pools charge up to 4.996%; a bad route costs extra.
FAQ
Is 富贵 a new token?
No. The main pool was created 2026-07-15T10:57:16Z, 1,453 hours before this snapshot. It is on the board today because an old pool started trading again.
What is the project behind it?
There is no independent project page. Our research package has all three fields empty; DexScreener's token info lists defiusdc.com, but that 302-redirects to a PONS launchpad page on pons-family.eu.com rather than anything about 富贵. No team, roadmap or supply figure is published.
Why does CoinGecko show a completely different number?
CoinGecko weights across venues; we are reading a single GeckoTerminal pool. The old pool starting from a floor prints +1,806%, yesterday's USDG pool prints +106%, and the weighted result is +30.2%. All three are "correct" on their own basis.
Could 富贵 rug?
I have no evidence either way — holder concentration is unavailable today and the deployer is anonymous. What can be said: one of the 20 pools uses 富贵 as a quote asset, and that kind of cross-holding amplifies a drawdown. For how a launchpad can remove this class of risk with a burned LP, see book.bigpump.ai or the create page.
Data time 2026-09-14 00:09-00:20 UTC. On-chain data analysis and opinion, not investment advice. Memecoins are extremely volatile and can go to zero. BigPump is an independent project with no affiliation with, endorsement by, or sponsorship from Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Disclaimer: memecoins are extremely volatile and most go to zero. This article is not financial advice. Do your own research and only spend what you can afford to lose.