$STOCKTARD -91% in Six Hours, 176x Turnover
- $STOCKTARD is six hours old: -85.77% on 6h, -63.40% on 24h, liquidity down to $13,469.
- $2,374,819 of 24h volume on that pool = 176.3x turnover, the most extreme on the chain.
- 20 pools appeared within two hours, including a 35.001% fee version. Those are tollbooths, not liquidity.
One line: $STOCKTARD is the best cautionary example on Robinhood Chain today. Six hours old, main pool STOCKTARD/SPY (paired against the tokenized S&P 500 ETF), down 85.77% in six hours, liquidity down to $13,469 — and it still churned $2,374,819 of volume in 24 hours.
Data card (2026-09-12 00:09 UTC)
| Price | $0.00002558 |
|---|---|
| 1h / 6h / 24h | +6.03% / -85.77% / -63.40% |
| 24h volume (main / token-wide) | $2,374,861 / $2,434,795 |
| Liquidity (main / all 20 pools) | $13,469 / $17,126 |
| Market cap | $25,582 |
| Turnover | 176.3x |
| 24h buys / sells | 14,679 / 13,871 |
| 24h distinct buyers / sellers | 922 / 980 |
| Age | 6 hours (main pool created 2026-09-11 17:52 UTC) |
| Project info | None found |
| Contract | 0xa909dd593195aabfbe1f53e089b2a3a50d8ddcf4 |
What 176x turnover actually means
Turnover = 24h volume ÷ liquidity. It answers one question: how many times was the money in this pool flipped today?
A normal mature token sits between 2x and 5x. On today's board, PONS is 2.8x, CHUMP 2.3x, CASHCAT 4.9x — that is "people hold it and occasionally trade".
STOCKTARD is 176.3x. A $13,469 pool supporting $2,374,819 of volume means every dollar in the pool was traded 176 times on average. Almost none of that can be genuine turnover demand. It looks like either:
- bots wash-trading a razor-thin pool at high frequency (every fill pays the pool fee, which makes this profitable for whoever built the pool), or
- one very fast pump-and-distribute — 14,679 buys against 13,871 sells is almost symmetrical, like an assembly line.
Compare $SIH, -96.61% in a day: same recipe — thin pool, enormous volume, short life.
20 pools built in two hours
| Pool | Liquidity | 24h vol | 24h change | Created (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| STOCKTARD / SPY | $13,469 | $2,374,861 | -63.69% | 09-11 17:52 |
| STOCKTARD / USDG 5% | $3,243 | $43,726 | -91.70% | 09-11 18:12 |
| STOCKTARD / WETH 4.88% | $107 | $2,072 | +5.27% | 09-11 18:22 |
| STOCKTARD / USDG 35.001% | $64 | $65 | -93.59% | 09-11 19:02 |
| STOCKTARD / WETH 0.9% | $45 | $6,913 | -63.33% | 09-11 19:42 |
| STOCKTARD / USDG 4.3% | $55 | $1,110 | -94.92% | 09-11 20:00 |
Main pool at 17:52. A 5% version twenty minutes later. A 35.001% version seventy minutes later. A 35% pool holding $64 is not there to be traded — it is there waiting for a routing mistake.
One more detail worth staring at: the STOCKTARD/WETH 0.9% pool holds $45 and processed $6,913 — every dollar flipped 153 times. Filling any real size in that pool is catastrophic on slippage.
About the SPY pairing
Robinhood Chain hosts tokenized stock tokens (SPY, NVDA, GOOGL and others), and pairing a memecoin against one of them is a signature move on this chain. It sounds clever: "my dog coin is pegged to the S&P."
For a trader it adds a layer of risk instead of removing one: your quote is now driven by both sides — the stock token's own depth, its own volatility, and the path between it and ETH all leak into your fill. FLYBRAIN has a FLYBRAIN/GOOGL pool ($247,988) today for the same reason. Pairing with a stock does not make a memecoin safer; it makes its pricing harder to read.
Three things you can actually do with this
- Compute turnover before you look at the price change. 24h volume ÷ liquidity. Above 20x, be careful. Above 50x, assume it is not natural. Two numbers, five seconds.
- Count the pools and scan the fee tiers. A six-hour-old token with 20 pools and fees from 0.9% to 35% has already become something to be farmed, not something being built. I wrote up how to read the fee fingerprint today.
- Read 6h, not 24h. STOCKTARD is -63.40% on 24h and -85.77% on 6h. The 24-hour window always lags. FLYBRAIN has the same problem today in the opposite direction (+67.80% on 24h, -33.18% on 6h).
What the buyer and seller counts add
One more angle worth pulling out. Over 24 hours STOCKTARD logged 14,679 buys and 13,871 sells — but only 922 distinct buyers and 980 distinct sellers.
Divide it out: roughly 16 buy tickets per buying address and 14 sell tickets per selling address. Real retail does not trade a six-hour-old memecoin sixteen times. That ratio is the signature of automated flow, and it is exactly why the volume figure ($2.37M) is meaningless as evidence of demand.
Compare today's $LPAD: 7,163 buys from 1,275 addresses, about 5.6 tickets per buyer — still high, but recognisably human. Or $PONS: 12,117 buys from 964 addresses on an $8.7M pool, where the depth justifies programmatic flow. STOCKTARD has the ticket profile of an algorithmic venue with the liquidity of a hobby project.
Also note the direction: 980 selling addresses versus 922 buying ones. More wallets left than arrived, on top of the 85.77% six-hour drop. There is no hidden accumulation story here.
Was there ever a moment this looked good?
Honest answer: for about an hour, probably yes. A brand-new token paired against SPY, on a chain where stock-paired memecoins are the signature trade, with volume exploding — from the outside that has the shape of a real launch. That is the uncomfortable part. The early minutes of a farm and the early minutes of a genuine launch look nearly identical on a price chart.
What separates them is not the chart, it is the structure around it: how many pools appeared, at what fees, how fast. By 19:02 UTC — seventy minutes in — a 35.001% fee pool existed. That is the moment the token stopped being ambiguous, and it happened long before the price gave anything away.
FAQ
Did $STOCKTARD rug?
On-chain, liquidity is still there ($13,469, not drained to zero), so this is not a textbook pull. For anyone who bought near the top, -85.77% in six hours is indistinguishable from one.
1h is +6.03% — is it bouncing?
In a $13,469 pool, +6.03% might take a few hundred dollars of buying. Bounce signals from thin pools carry almost no information.
Is there a team behind it?
No public data — no site, no X account, no description anywhere I could find.
How do I catch this before buying?
Three numbers together: age, liquidity, turnover. Under 24 hours old + under $20,000 of liquidity + over 50x turnover — if all three hit, walk away.
Is there a launch structure that is harder to play this way?
Yes. On BigPump launch page, graduation mints the LP tokens straight to the dead address (0x…dEaD), so the main pool's liquidity is permanently locked and nobody can pull it — and the tax logic lives inside the token contract's transfer function, so switching frontend, router or aggregator does not bypass it. That does not make a token go up, but it removes the "team pulled the pool" and "fragmented tollbooth pools" categories of risk. See the docs.
See also today's full hot-token report.
BigPump is an independent project, not affiliated with, endorsed by or sponsored by Robinhood Markets, Inc. All on-chain figures come from the 2026-09-12 00:09 UTC snapshot; pool-level data was pulled the same day between 00:15 and 00:35 UTC. Not financial advice — memecoins are extremely volatile and most go to zero.
Disclaimer: memecoins are extremely volatile and most go to zero. This article is not financial advice. Do your own research and only spend what you can afford to lose.