Robinhood Chain Hot Tokens Sep 14: 4 Golden Dogs
- Four golden dogs today: 富贵 +1,843.42%, BLAST +1,480.70%, TWINE +290.25%, SWARM +109.59%
- Hot 12 printed 75,378 buys / 65,157 sells but 15,614 / 16,620 unique wallets — 11 of 12 distributing
- $100 look-back median $118.91, best in six days; yesterday's leader CATGPT is -71.49%
Robinhood Chain printed four golden dogs today (24h ≥ +100% with liquidity ≥ $20k), the most in a week. But count people instead of candles and 11 of the 12 hot tokens had more unique sellers than unique buyers. Prices went up. Holders went out.
Every on-chain number here comes from the BigPump research package, data time 2026-09-14 00:09 UTC, with pool-level data pulled 00:10–00:20 UTC the same day. ETH = $2,478.08. BigPump is an independent project with no affiliation with, endorsement by, or sponsorship from Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Today's tape: more buy prints, fewer buyers
The hot 12 did $41,018,068 in 24h volume against $43,374,343 yesterday — down just 5.4%. After two days of -58% collapses, that counts as stabilising. At the chain level, GeckoTerminal's Robinhood page shows 24h volume of $1.55B, -13.25% across 7.54M transactions (source, pulled 2026-09-14); yesterday the same page read $1.79B / -37.63%. The bleed is slowing, not reversing.
The structure underneath is what matters. Across the 12 tokens, 24h transaction counts were 75,378 buys / 65,157 sells — buys ahead by 15.7%, which looks bullish. Unique wallets tell the opposite story: 15,614 buyers / 16,620 sellers, a ratio of 0.94.
Token by token, only 富贵 has a buyer/seller ratio above 1.0 (1.08). BLAST 0.99, TWINE 0.90, SWARM 0.84, BANGERCAT 0.84, CHUMP 0.83, PAIREX 0.82, AI 0.61. That is the most uniform distribution signature I have seen this week: a small group buying repeatedly while a larger group exits. Transaction counts are not dollars — I worked that through on $PAIR, and today it applies to the whole board.
The board (2026-09-14 00:09 UTC)
| # | Token | Price | 1h | 24h | 24h vol | Liquidity | Turnover | Buyers/Sellers | Age |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 富贵 | $0.0028173 | +12.49% | +1,843.42% | $9,404,368 | $233,286 | 40.3x | 4,425/4,081 | 1,453h |
| 2 | BLAST | $0.0008295 | -16.17% | +1,480.70% | $6,615,096 | $70,922 | 93.3x | 3,709/3,738 | 19h |
| 3 | TWINE | $0.0042874 | -30.60% | +290.25% | $5,555,294 | $189,862 | 29.3x | 2,221/2,462 | 29h |
| 4 | SWARM | $0.0008837 | +33.50% | +109.59% | $1,657,115 | $83,203 | 19.9x | 1,169/1,389 | 34h |
| 5 | RAXOL | $0.0062374 | -11.21% | +89.82% | $1,209,309 | $341,730 | 3.5x | 376/419 | 1,764h |
| 6 | BANGERCAT | $0.0004183 | -6.70% | +40.30% | $617,387 | $51,433 | 12.0x | 490/580 | 35h |
| 7 | CHUMP | $0.0381834 | +0.12% | -2.47% | $3,116,500 | $1,332,834 | 2.3x | 603/725 | 1,078h |
| 8 | PONS | $0.5421307 | -1.23% | -9.02% | $8,731,963 | $7,675,137 | 1.1x | 657/752 | 1,390h |
| 9 | WALLET | $0.0562385 | -1.83% | -13.37% | $1,658,508 | $3,327,593 | 0.5x | 620/728 | 1,583h |
| 10 | AI | $0.2437994 | -8.61% | -19.50% | $1,181,101 | $24,072,644 | 0.05x | 367/597 | 1,470h |
| 11 | PAIREX | $0.0008195 | -0.02% | -37.89% | $773,472 | $69,858 | 11.1x | 560/680 | 42h |
| 12 | ROBIN | $0.0032594 | -0.55% | -39.66% | $497,956 | $145,471 | 3.4x | 417/469 | 199h |
The four golden dogs
富贵 +1,843.42% — an old pool waking up, not a new launch
Why it moved: plenty of people are treating this as a fresh launch. The main pool, 富贵/WETH 1%, was created 2026-07-15T10:57:16Z — 1,453 hours ago. A pool that sat dormant for two months has a near-zero base, so any real bid prints four digits. Volume was $9,404,368 at 40.3x turnover with 4,425 unique buyers, so the participation is genuinely broad, not one wallet.
Case for more: token-wide liquidity across 20 pools is $431,516, and a 富贵/USDG 2.5% pool built yesterday at 02:04 holds $136,671 of that — new money adding real depth. 1h is still +12.49%, and market cap / liquidity of 12.3x is mid-pack today.
Case against: three sources disagree by an order of magnitude. The main pool reads +1,805.89%, yesterday's USDG pool reads +106.4%, and CoinGecko reads the same token at +30.2% with a $2.79M market cap (source, pulled 2026-09-14). The 1,843% is one pool measured from a floor, not a claim that anyone actually made 18x. 6h is already -9.94%.
My read: I would not chase it. Treat the USDG pool's +106% as the honest number. Trade page
BLAST +1,480.70% — two pools, 17x apart
This is the one to remember. The BLAST/WETH pool (created 2026-09-13T05:34:44Z, liquidity $70,975) is +1,480.7% on 24h. The deepest pool, BLAST/USDG 4.89% (created 06:51:43Z — 77 minutes later — liquidity $83,391), is -10.34%. Same token, same day: which pool you landed in decides whether you are up 15x or down 10%.
Case against: token-wide turnover across 20 pools is 50.9x, the buyer/seller ratio is 0.81 (8,028 / 9,957), and every major pool is -16% to -18% on the hour. That is a textbook reversal shape. Trade page
TWINE +290.25% — every pool down 23-29% in an hour
A 29-hour launch that was +465.86% on 6h and is now -30.60% on 1h. I pulled all 20 pools: the six deepest print 1h changes of -23.61%, -26.52%, -27.39%, -28.05%, -28.47% and -28.78%. Not one exception. This is not one pool getting dumped, it is the whole token retracing. Buyer/seller ratio 0.80. Token-wide liquidity is $986,646 — 5.2x the $189,862 main-pool reading, which is healthier than BLAST. Trade page
SWARM +109.59% — the only token green on all three windows
+33.50% on 1h, +27.66% on 6h, +109.59% on 24h — the only name on the board green across all three. It also has the only narrative I could verify today: the project site swarmboard.world publishes a contract address that matches the research package exactly, and describes itself as "a home for AI agents, with a window for you." No supply or allocation figures are published.
Case against: buyer/seller ratio 0.84, turnover 19.9x, and liquidity of only $83,203 — at that depth a five-figure order visibly moves the price. Trade page
Wealth effect: $118.91 median, best in six days
Put $100 into each of the 12 tokens 24 hours ago (back-calculated from 24h change — this is a look-back, not a forecast): median $118.91, 6 up and 6 down. Best 富贵 at $1,943.42, worst ROBIN at $60.34. The last five medians: 09-13 $88.30, 09-12 $101.13, 09-11 $94.68, 09-10 $98.07, 09-09 $97.84. Today is the only one of the six clearly above $100.
Mind the survivorship bias: these are the tokens still on the board. Yesterday's number-one, CATGPT, is -71.49% today ($100 → $28.51) and has dropped off entirely.
Risk desk: three tokens sharing one trap-pool template
Scanning pools turned up something solid today. $FRONTIER (covered yesterday), $PAIREX and $BANGERCAT — three unrelated tokens — carry character-identical fee values: 81% appears in all three; 83.037% in FRONTIER and BANGERCAT; 80.19% in PAIREX and BANGERCAT.
The timestamps are blunter. BANGERCAT's four high-fee pools were created 14:10:22-14:10:52 — inside 30 seconds. PAIREX's three: 05:57:29-05:58:39, inside 70 seconds. FRONTIER's three: 14:52:25-14:52:37, inside 12 seconds. Each holds $1-$357 and logs buys with zero sells over 24h (BANGERCAT's four: 9/0, 8/0, 6/0, 4/0). Buy in, can't sell out, 80% fee. Full breakdown here.
What to do: check which pool you are routed into and what it charges before you sign. BigPump's hot-token trade pages show pools and trades directly, so you don't have to dig through an explorer.
New launch watchlist
Ten launches today, all 0 hours old with $3,716-$23,172 in liquidity: ELON ($23,172, 24h +285.94%), POKE ($11,062, +207.47%), TRMNS ($7,627, -30.24%), ASSET, BULK, GRABBA, PLINTH, HARVEST, BATONGUY, STOCKCAT.
For calibration, yesterday's list 24 hours on: 0 of 10 up, median -3.97%, and all ten combined managed 46 buys and $11,893 of volume for the day. The post-mortem is here.
FAQ
Is 富贵 really up 1,843% in 24 hours?
In the 富贵/WETH pool created 2026-07-15, yes. The USDG pool built yesterday is up 106.4% over the same window, and CoinGecko reads +30.2%. The percentage depends on which pool you measure and what base it starts from.
Should I chase today's golden dogs?
Three of the four (富贵, BLAST, TWINE) are already negative on 1h or 6h, and all four have buyer/seller ratios at or below 1.0. SWARM is the only one green on all three windows, but it holds just $83,203 of liquidity. I would not size into any of them here. Not investment advice — memecoins can go to zero.
How do I buy these on Robinhood Chain?
Bridge ETH to Robinhood Chain (chainId 4663, gas paid in ETH), then use a BigPump hot-token page to read the chart, trades and pools and swap on-site. To launch your own token, use the create page; mechanics are documented at book.bigpump.ai.
Why is holder data blank?
The upstream endpoint has returned 403 for a fifth straight day, so holder counts and top-1/top-10 concentration are unavailable. The substitutes are turnover, market cap / liquidity, unique buyer/seller ratio, and pool count plus fee distribution.
Data time 2026-09-14 00:09-00:20 UTC. This is on-chain data analysis and opinion, not investment advice. Memecoins are extremely volatile and can go to zero. BigPump is an independent project with no affiliation with, endorsement by, or sponsorship from Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Disclaimer: memecoins are extremely volatile and most go to zero. This article is not financial advice. Do your own research and only spend what you can afford to lose.